Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Julian Lenz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kuzmanov vs Lenz analysis and find out who is favored!
Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Julian Lenz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kuzmanov has won 51.97% of points on his second serve, while Lenz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kuzmanov, in recent form, has won 50.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lenz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kuzmanov has saved 54.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lenz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kuzmanov has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 25/ 30), with Lenz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kuzmanov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 202/ 86), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 16/ 33). Lenz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 121/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kuzmanov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.35% of matches (W/L 25/ 21), where as Lenz has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kuzmanov winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kuzmanov winning 1 and Lenz winning 2. The last match between Kuzmanov and Lenz was at the Tulln Challenger, 06-09-2022, First, Clay with Julian Lenz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:30:27.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kuzmanov and Lenz have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kuzmanov winning 0 times and Lenz 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kuzmanov winning 1, and Lenz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kuzmanov has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.62 while Lenz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kuzmanov has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lenz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kuzmanov has converted 33.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lenz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kuzmanov 0 - 1 Lenz
265
Rank
158
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
864
Rank
227
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
63% (503-294)
Career Total W/L
55% (207-169)
33% (6-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$81,100
Career Prize Money
$25,665
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dimitar Kuzmanov | Julian Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 8 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:30:27 | 2:30:27 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (64/92) | 57% (53/93) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (38/64) | 75% (40/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (13/28) | 50% (20/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 50% (6/12) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (33/93) | 45% (41/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Julian Lenz
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dimitar Kuzmanov | Julian Lenz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (20/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (229/243) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 67 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:2 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 375.28 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (990/1426) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (643/990) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (228/436) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (46/139) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (519/1412) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (6/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Dimitar Kuzmanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gauthier Onclin
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
70%
(
81 of
115)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
115
Total Points Won
99
|
6-3 6-7(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
78%
(
59 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Rudolf Molleker
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
61%
(
83 of
136)
1st Serve %
71%
(
76 of
107)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
48 of
76)
36%
(
19 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
42%
(
57 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Filip Misolic
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
9
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
78%
(
46 of
59)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Julian Lenz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
111)
11
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
58 of
79)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
114
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
107)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Hazem Naow
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Julian Lenz
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
19
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Aldin Setkic
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
14
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Andrew Paulson
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
12
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
30%
(
36 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
30 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(6) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Julian Lenz
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
8
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
28%
(
10 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Julian Lenz
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kuzmanov Vs Lenz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
