Dominik Nazaruk vs Roland Stuurman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nazaruk vs Stuurman analysis and find out who is favored!
Dominik Nazaruk vs Roland Stuurman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nazaruk has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Stuurman has won 45.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nazaruk, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stuurman has won 52.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nazaruk has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stuurman has saved 46.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nazaruk has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Stuurman winning 58.82% (W/L 30/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nazaruk has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 14/ 9), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 21/ 27). Stuurman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 45/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 52/ 54).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nazaruk winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nazaruk winning 2 and Stuurman winning 0. The last match between Nazaruk and Stuurman was at the M15 Haren, 26-08-2019, Q2 round, Clay with Dominik Nazaruk getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nazaruk and Stuurman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nazaruk winning 0 times and Stuurman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nazaruk winning 0, and Stuurman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nazaruk has played against opponents with an average rank of while Stuurman has played against players with an average rank of 49.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nazaruk has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stuurman has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nazaruk has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stuurman has converted 40.7% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nazaruk 1 - 0 Stuurman
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (83-90)
Career Total W/L
52% (98-91)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
63% (12-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Dominik Nazaruk | Roland Stuurman |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Dominik Nazaruk | Roland Stuurman |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (25/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (247/220) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 0 | 7 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 0 | 36 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 38.53 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (357/534) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (215/357) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (79/177) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (24/54) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (228/552) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (12/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 61% (11/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/9) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 91% (11/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Dominik Nazaruk Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 2-2 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-6 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Roland Stuurman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Tauheed Browning
Player
Roland Stuurman
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Romain Faucon
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Milos Karol
Player
Roland Stuurman
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Sebastian Sorger
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Mousa Alkotop
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 2-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more