Edan Leshem vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Leshem vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Edan Leshem vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Leshem has won 38.27% of points on his second serve, while Chappell has won 48.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Leshem, in recent form, has won 55.56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 53.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.78% and 34.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Leshem has saved 46.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 54.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Leshem has won 47.37% of matches played (W/L 9/ 10), with Chappell winning 53.09% (W/L 43/ 38) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 162), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 215/ 145), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Leshem winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Leshem winning 4 and Chappell winning 0. The last match between Leshem and Chappell was at the Israel F10, 11-06-2016, Final, Hard with Edan Leshem getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Leshem and Chappell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Leshem winning 0 times and Chappell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Leshem winning 0, and Chappell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Leshem has played against opponents with an average rank of 191.68 while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 265.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Leshem has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Leshem has converted 48.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 45.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Leshem 2 - 0 Chappell
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
800
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
428
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
58% (308-220)
Career Total W/L
53% (298-261)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$26,870
Career Prize Money
$24,525
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Edan Leshem | Nick Chappell |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (50/91) | 69% (86/125) |
1st Serve Win% | 80% (40/50) | 51% (44/86) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (24/41) | 41% (16/39) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 67% (2/3) |
Return Points W% | 52% (65/125) | 30% (27/91) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Nick Chappell
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
6-3 6-3 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Edan Leshem | Nick Chappell |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 41% (7/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 41% (15/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (33/40) | 47% (158/180) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 54% (7/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
Aces Total | 0 | 18 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 10 | 36 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:23 | 1:37:49 |
Avg Opp Rank | 119 | 305.24 |
1st Serve % | 66% (159/240) | 61% (669/1089) |
1st Serve W% | 58% (93/159) | 62% (418/669) |
2nd Serve W% | 38% (31/81) | 45% (189/420) |
BPs Won% Total | 48% (14/29) | 44% (52/119) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (93/219) | 41% (452/1095) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (7/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 41% (7/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 86% (7/6) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 14% (7/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Hynek Barton
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Lars Wagenaar
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more