Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eduardo Nava vs Kyle Kang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Kang analysis and find out who is favored!
Eduardo Nava vs Kyle Kang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kang has won 49.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kang has won 53.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kang has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kang winning 54.55% (W/L 12/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Kang winning 0. The last match between Nava and Kang was at the M15 Fountain Valley, 06-07-2022, First, Hard with Eduardo Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Kang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Kang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Kang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kang has played against players with an average rank of 228.23.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kang has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kang has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Kang
842
Rank
792
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
772
Rank
591
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
54% (77-66)
Career Total W/L
52% (43-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
40% (2-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Eduardo Nava | Kyle Kang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:0 | 1:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (44/69) | 56% (42/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (36/44) | 74% (31/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (29/75) | 29% (20/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Eduardo Nava
Player
Kyle Kang
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eduardo Nava | Kyle Kang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (50/50) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 11 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:32:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 217 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (191/320) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (126/191) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (61/129) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (16/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (124/312) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Eduardo Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Matej Vocel
Player
Eduardo Nava
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
29 of
62)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Brandon Carpico
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Robin Catry
Player
Eduardo Nava
58%
(
56 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Filippo Moroni
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduardo Nava
Player
Jesse Flores
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Eduardo Nava
56%
(
63 of
112)
1st Serve %
55%
(
82 of
149)
14
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
10
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
60 of
82)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
60 of
149)
132
Total Points Won
129
|
7-6(4) 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Eduardo Nava
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Donald Young
Player
Eduardo Nava
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
7
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Eduardo Nava
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
10
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
96%
(
25 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Eduardo Nava
63%
(
83 of
132)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
47%
(
23 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ethan Quinn
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Axel Nefve
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Rubin
Player
Kyle Kang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Kyle Kang
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Karue Sell
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ozan Baris
77%
(
56 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alessio Vasquez Gehrke
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Kang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
