Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Edward Corrie vs Nathaniel Lammons Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Corrie vs Lammons analysis and find out who is favored!
Edward Corrie vs Nathaniel Lammons Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Corrie has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammons has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Corrie, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammons has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Corrie has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammons has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Corrie has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Corrie has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 160/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 41/ 47). Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Corrie winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Corrie winning 2 and Lammons winning 0. The last match between Corrie and Lammons was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 28-10-2017, Q1 round, I.hard with Edward Corrie getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:34.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Corrie and Lammons have played a deciding set 0 times, with Corrie winning 0 times and Lammons 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Corrie winning 0, and Lammons 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Corrie has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lammons has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Corrie has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Corrie has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammons has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Corrie 1 - 0 Lammons
Ret.
Rank
215
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
57% (308-229)
Career Total W/L
54% (78-67)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$14,925
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Edward Corrie | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:34 | 1:10:34 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (32/60) | 56% (31/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (21/32) | 61% (19/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (17/28) | 42% (10/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (26/55) | 37% (22/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Edward Corrie
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Edward Corrie | Nathaniel Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Edward Corrie Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Edward Corrie
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tobias Kamke
Player
Edward Corrie
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jonathan Gray
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Joshua Paris
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Jack Molloy
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edward Corrie
Player
Christian Harrison
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Niels Desein
Player
Edward Corrie
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
29 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Corrie Vs Lammons Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
