Edward Winter vs Maxwell Mckennon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Sep at 09:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Winter vs M. Mckennon

AUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Winter 2 - 0 Mckennon
They have played 5 sets in total, with Edward Winter winning 4 and Maxwell Mckennon winning 1. The last match between Edward Winter and Maxwell Mckennon was at the Tiburon Challenger, 28-09-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Edward Winter getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Winter | 2 |
| Mckennon | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Tiburon Challenger(09-28-25)
(R2) M15 Irvine(06-29-23)
E. Winter vs M. Mckennon H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $118,500 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.38% (101-72) | Career Total W/L | 54.93% (78-64) |
| 2 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 2 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Winter vs M. Mckennon Match Preview:
- In the recent six months, Maxwell Mckennon has a slightly better second serve performance, winning 44.51% of points compared to Edward Winter’s 43.40%. Will this small edge impact the outcome?
- When examining return games, Edward Winter proves stronger, winning 45.81% of opponent's second serve points, outperforming Mckennon’s 41.22%. He also excels at first serve returns with 28.49%, compared to Maxwell's 20.23%.
- Edward Winter is slightly more resilient under pressure, saving 56.09% of breakpoints whereas Maxwell has saved 53.91%.
- Maxwell Mckennon has a higher match win percentage over the last year (62.69%) than Edward Winter (59.65%).
- Maxwell excels on indoor hard surfaces with a win percentage of 63%, whereas Edward performs best on hard surfaces with a 58% win rate.
- Both players often compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Maxwell boasting a slightly better win rate of 66.67% versus Edward's 61.76%.
- Edward Winter leads in their head-to-head matchups, having won their single encounter despite Maxwell winning one of the three sets played.
- Over the past year, Edward faced higher-ranked opponents (average rank of 376) compared to Maxwell's 416.37.
- Maxwell is more successful in deciding sets, winning 56% compared to Edward's 41%.
Editorial Prediction (September 28, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both recent performance and historical encounters suggests a closely contested match between Maxwell Mckennon and Edward Winter. While Maxwell boasts a slight advantage in second serve success and deciding set outcomes, Edward has a superior return game and experience against higher-ranked opponents.
Their head-to-head history, featuring Edward's victory in their only match, indicates his potential dominance, especially with his stronger breakpoint saving ability.
In this upcoming match, taking into account Edward’s resilience under pressure and better performance on hard court surfaces, Edward Winter is projected to be the likely winner.
Edward Winter vs Maxwell Mckennon Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Winter vs M. Mckennon H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 26 | Games Won | 21 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:6:36 | Average Match Time | 2:6:36 |
| 62% (98/158) | 1st Serve % | 51% (82/160) |
| 72% (71/98) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (57/82) |
| 53% (32/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (39/78) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 40% (64/160) | Return Points Win % | 35% (55/158) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Winter Recent Matches Played
M. Mckennon Recent Matches Played

E. Winter vs M. Mckennon Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.38% (101/72) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.93% (78/64) |
| 58.14% (225/162) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.98% (171/140) |
| 54.25% (1966/1658) | Games Win/Loss | 52.83% (1522/1359) |
| 59.21% (90/62) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.69% (70/58) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 312 | Aces Total | 505 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 477 | Total Double Faults | 397 |
| 1:38:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 407.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.25 |
| 65% (6969/10690) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4362/7244) |
| 68% (4710/6969) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (3141/4362) |
| 51% (1882/3721) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1504/2882) |
| 41% (503/1213) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (273/677) |
| 42% (4457/10727) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2761/7305) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.38% (22/20) | Challenger W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 63.11% (77/45) | Futures W/L | 56.90% (66/50) |
| 58% (100/172) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (78/138) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 54% (28/52) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (16/37) |
| 43% (17/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 85% (105/89) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (81/72) |
| 15% (105/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (81/9) |
| 18% (68/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (61/6) |