Eliot Spizzirri vs Vit Kopriva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do the players compare in second serve performance? Over the past 6 months, Spizzirri holds a slight edge, claiming 46% of points compared to Kopriva’s 44.65%.
• In return games, Kopriva excels, winning 49.70% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Spizzirri’s 45.50%. On first serve returns, Kopriva also leads with 27.46% against Spizzirri’s 26.13%.
• Under pressure, Spizzirri has the upper hand in breakpoint situations, saving 52.66% while Kopriva saves 51.80%. This could be crucial in tight moments.
• Over the last year, Spizzirri wins 65.17% of his matches, slightly better than Kopriva’s 61.11%, suggesting greater consistency in outcomes.
• Surface preferences show that Kopriva favors clay, boasting a 61% win rate, whereas Spizzirri is more successful on indoor hard courts at 61%.
• On the Challenger/ITF circuit, Spizzirri again slightly outshines Kopriva with a 70.77% win rate compared to 69.05%.
• Considering opponent strength, Spizzirri faces slightly higher-ranked competitors with an average rank of 230.15, while Kopriva's opponents average a rank of 239.81.
• Both players are equally adept at winning deciding sets, each marking a 69% success rate.
• Current form at the event can offer additional insights, emphasizing recent performance for predicting the match result.

Editorial Prediction (November 2, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Vit Kopriva and Eliot Spizzirri promises to be a closely contested encounter. Both players display strengths in different aspects of their games, which may offer insights into who could have the upper hand.

Spizzirri showcases a slightly more robust second serve performance and seems to thrive under pressure, as evidenced by his superior breakpoint saving percentage. This resilience may be pivotal in clutch situations.

However, Kopriva’s ability to win return points, particularly on the second serve, suggests he could capitalize on Spizzirri’s deliveries, possibly turning matches in his favor given his proficiency in this area.

While recent performance tilts marginally in favor of Spizzirri with a higher win rate over the last year, both contenders excel on different surfaces which might not play a significant role in the current match setting.

Factoring in all elements, Spizzirri’s slight edge in critical areas like pressure situations and serving efficiency could make him the more likely victor in this match.