Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Roberto Cid Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ruusuvuori vs Cid analysis and find out who is favored!
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Roberto Cid Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruusuvuori has won 53.86% of points on his second serve, while Cid has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruusuvuori, in recent form, has won 54.02% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cid has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruusuvuori has saved 61.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cid has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruusuvuori has won 54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 23), with Cid winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruusuvuori has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 98/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 45/ 49). Cid has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruusuvuori has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 16/ 11), where as Cid has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruusuvuori has played against opponents with an average rank of 129.24 while Cid has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruusuvuori has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cid has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruusuvuori has converted 36.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cid has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ruusuvuori 0 - 0 Cid
68
Rank
37
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
62% (273-167)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,433,160
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ruusuvuori VS Cid H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emil Ruusuvuori | Roberto Cid |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (26/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (237/218) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 87 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:35 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.11 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (880/1432) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (634/880) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (302/552) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (46/130) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (556/1456) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
71%
(
10 of
14)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Christopher O'Connell
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
13
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
42 of
54)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Ugo Humbert
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
36 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Luca Van Assche
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Cid Recent Matches Played
Before:
No Past Matches Available
Ruusuvuori Vs Cid Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
