Emiliana Arango vs Suzan Lamens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Sep at 11:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Arango vs S. Lamens

COL
2
Win
Played
1
Win

NED
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Arango 2 - 1 Lamens
They have played 6 sets in total, with Emiliana Arango winning 4 and Suzan Lamens winning 2. The last match between Emiliana Arango and Suzan Lamens was at the China Open - Beijing, 25-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Emiliana Arango getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Arango | 2 |
Lamens | 1 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) China Open - Beijing(09-25-25)
(R1) Oeiras Ladies Open - Oeiras(04-17-24)
(SF) W25 Mosquera(03-25-23)
E. Arango vs S. Lamens H2H Profile
E. Arango vs S. Lamens Match Preview:
- Emiliana Arango has a slightly lower recent performance on second serve points, winning 37.19%, compared to Suzan Lamens' 38.01%. Does this minor difference favor Lamens? Yes, it slightly does in terms of serve reliability.
- On return games, Arango demonstrates strength by winning 53.13% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Lamens' 51.61%. Who is more effective here? Arango shows more prowess in return games over recent form.
- Their performance under pressure is nearly identical with Arango saving 48.10% and Lamens 48.18% of breakpoints. Could this indicate a tight match under pressure? Most likely, as neither holds a significant advantage.
- Regarding match wins over the past year, Lamens leads with 57.97% compared to Arango's 52.38%. Does this suggest a stronger overall performance? Yes, Lamens edges out slightly in consistency.
- Both players excel on clay, but Lamens holds a marginal edge with a 60% win rate versus Arango's 59% on this surface. Could surface preference be a deciding factor? It might be, given their similar strengths.
- Lamens has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 132.03, compared to Arango's 176.84. Does this experience against higher-ranked players give Lamens an upper hand? Potentially, as exposure to stronger opponents can improve competitiveness.
- They are evenly matched in their direct head-to-head, each winning one match. Does this indicate a possible back-and-forth outcome? Yes, their previous encounters suggest a closely contested match.
- Regarding deciding sets, Lamens performs slightly better, winning 58% compared to Arango's 50%. Could this resilience in crucial moments be determinative? It might contribute to her ability to clinch tight matches.
Editorial Prediction (September 25, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming tennis match between Emiliana Arango and Suzan Lamens promises to be a closely fought contest. Both players have shown similar capabilities on clay, their favored surface. However, Lamens has a slight edge in second serve performance and overall match win rate.
Their past head-to-head battles have been evenly split, though Lamens' experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests she might handle the pressure better. Additionally, Lamens' superior record in deciding sets could prove crucial if the match goes the distance.
While both players have their strengths and exhibit contrasting skills, Suzan Lamens appears to have a minor advantage. Given the overall analysis, it seems likely that Suzan Lamens will emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.
Emiliana Arango vs Suzan Lamens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Arango vs S. Lamens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
4 | Sets Won | 2 |
31 | Games Won | 23 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
11 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
1:35:1 | Average Match Time | 1:35:1 |
70% (134/192) | 1st Serve % | 56% (100/180) |
54% (72/134) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (57/100) |
53% (31/58) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (35/80) |
52% (14/27) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (10/24) |
49% (88/180) | Return Points Win % | 46% (89/192) |
67% (2/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (1/3) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Arango Recent Matches Played
S. Lamens Recent Matches Played

E. Arango vs S. Lamens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.67% (242/185) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.27% (311/232) |
55.47% (532/427) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.55% (691/553) |
52.91% (4573/4070) | Games Win/Loss | 52.73% (5972/5354) |
56.60% (90/69) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.75% (86/74) |
58.72% (138/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.26% (188/124) |
46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (32/24) |
40.00% (8/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (5/10) |
0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
390 | Aces Total | 880 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.47 |
1190 | Total Double Faults | 2572 |
1:27:24 | Average Match Time | 1:29:53 |
243.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.12 |
67% (16304/24495) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19267/32716) |
59% (9622/16304) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (11882/19220) |
44% (3622/8191) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (5758/13521) |
48% (1636/3421) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (2205/4362) |
47% (11962/25280) | Return Points Win % | 48% (15740/32913) |
27.78% (5/13) | Slam W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
53.57% (15/13) | Masters W/L | 41.18% (7/10) |
52.94% (9/8) | Cups W/L | 73.33% (11/4) |
45.45% (25/30) | Main Tour W/L | 52.46% (32/29) |
59.16% (155/107) | Challenger W/L | 62.08% (167/102) |
70.21% (33/14) | Futures W/L | 54.27% (89/75) |
57% (236/414) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (308/539) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
47% (33/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (51/102) |
54% (61/113) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (89/160) |
88% (238/210) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (287/259) |
11% (238/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (287/28) |
16% (189/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (256/52) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
