Emilio Nava vs Borna Coric Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Regarding recent second serve efficiency, Nava has a slight edge with 47.12% success compared to Coric's 45.59%.
• When it comes to returning opponents' second serves, Nava has an advantage, winning 46.91% of points, while Coric stands at 43.08%.
• Coric performs marginally better on first serve returns at 23.62%, just ahead of Nava's 22.99%.
• Both players are almost equal under pressure, with a negligible difference in breakpoints saved: Coric at 55.24% and Nava at 55.15%.
• Over the past year, Nava has a slightly better win rate overall (65.17% vs. Coric's 63.46%).
• Coric excels on indoor hard courts with his best surface win percentage of 61%, while Nava shines on clay, winning 67% of matches.
• In Challengers/ITF matches over the last year, Coric has been more dominant, winning 83.33%, compared to Nava's 69.57% performance.
• Coric has faced stronger competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 173.9, whereas Nava's opponents averaged a ranking of 232.97.
• In deciding sets, Nava holds a better record, winning 54% of them, whereas Coric has a 45% success rate.
• For break point conversion, Coric edges ahead by converting 30.47% of opportunities against Nava’s 28.05%.

Editorial Prediction (August 8, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent performance metrics, Nava exhibits a better record on the second serve point wins and in returning opponents' second serves. His slight edge in these crucial areas might provide him with additional opportunities during the match.

Coric, however, demonstrates superior strength in first serve returns and break point conversions, indicating potential to capitalize on key moments. His capability to save breakpoints reflects composure under pressure.

While both players have promising skills, Coric's experience against tougher opponents and better performance in the initial rounds of the current level competition over the past year could be pivotal.

Considering all factors, including surface proficiency, opponent quality, and historical success in challenging matches, Coric appears to have a slight advantage and is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming contest.