Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilio Nava vs Gerald Melzer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Melzer analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Nava vs Gerald Melzer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 49.23% of points on his second serve, while Melzer has won 53.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Melzer has won 52.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.6% and 36.89% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 67.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Melzer has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 48/ 30), with Melzer winning 63.16% (W/L 24/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 62/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20). Melzer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 394/ 244), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 4/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.78% of matches (W/L 31/ 20), where as Melzer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.96% of matches (W/L 17/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Melzer winning 1. The last match between Nava and Melzer was at the Prague 2 Challenger, 10-08-2021, First, Clay with Emilio Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Melzer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nava winning 1 times and Melzer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 0, and Melzer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.14 while Melzer has played against players with an average rank of 234.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Melzer has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Melzer has converted 45.79% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Melzer
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
563
Rank
68
High
33
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
60% (170-113)
Career Total W/L
59% (435-300)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
69% (9-4)
$402,385
Career Prize Money
$199,225
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emilio Nava | Gerald Melzer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:39 | 1:31:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (53/76) | 72% (49/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (39/53) | 57% (28/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (9/23) | 47% (9/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (6/6) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (31/68) | 37% (28/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Gerald Melzer
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
10
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilio Nava | Gerald Melzer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 69% (9/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (35/24) | 65% (20/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (320/285) | 56% (158/125) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 210 | 34 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:55 | 1:50:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.62 | 218.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1237/1949) | 61% (547/895) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (902/1237) | 68% (374/547) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (358/712) | 53% (185/348) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (63/152) | 46% (49/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (652/1834) | 43% (417/970) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 69% (9/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 40% (5/2) |
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gerald Melzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
70%
(
80 of
114)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
3
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
60 of
77)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
43 of
128)
117
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Alexander Frusina
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Gerald Melzer
57%
(
66 of
115)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
46 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Mathys Erhard
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Jorge Martinez Martinez
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Gerald Melzer
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Melzer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
