Emilio Nava vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Nava vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 49.61% of points on his second serve, while Zima has won 42.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 48.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 46.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.64% and 27.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 65.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 61.04% of matches played (W/L 47/ 30), with Zima winning 55.1% (W/L 27/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 61/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 55/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.58 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 143.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 41.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 48.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 0 - 0 Zima
3
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
132
Rank
132
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
60% (169-112)
Career Total W/L
56% (152-120)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
71% (12-5)
$402,385
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Emilio Nava | Leopold Zima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 71% (12/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) | 62% (24/15) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (294/261) | 53% (204/180) |
Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 71% (5/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 70% (7/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.76 | 0.31 |
Aces Total | 206 | 59 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 63 | 18 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:27 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 252.38 | 180.41 |
1st Serve % | 64% (1132/1772) | 70% (466/668) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (829/1132) | 71% (333/466) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (323/640) | 41% (83/202) |
BPs Won% Total | 40% (57/143) | 39% (19/49) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (602/1691) | 34% (214/629) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 71% (12/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 33% (2/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 100% (5/5) |
1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 100% (11/11) |
1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (11/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 17% (6/1) |
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leopold Zima
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Florian Broska
Player
Leopold Zima
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-7(3) 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Mischa Lanz
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H |
view more