Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Emilio Nava vs Yannick Maden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nava vs Maden analysis and find out who is favored!
Emilio Nava vs Yannick Maden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nava has won 49.23% of points on his second serve, while Maden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nava, in recent form, has won 48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Maden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nava has saved 67.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nava has won 61.04% of matches played (W/L 47/ 30), with Maden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 62/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20). Maden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 196/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20), where as Maden has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nava winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nava winning 2 and Maden winning 0. The last match between Nava and Maden was at the Pozoblanco Challenger, 20-07-2021, First, Hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:20:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nava and Maden have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nava winning 0 times and Maden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nava winning 1, and Maden 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nava has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.92 while Maden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nava has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nava has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nava 1 - 0 Maden
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
784
Rank
96
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
60% (170-113)
Career Total W/L
61% (339-219)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$402,385
Career Prize Money
$381,245
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Emilio Nava | Yannick Maden |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:20:8 | 1:20:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (32/53) | 67% (42/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (27/32) | 67% (28/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 81% (17/21) | 52% (11/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (24/63) | 17% (9/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Maden
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Emilio Nava | Yannick Maden |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (35/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (320/285) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 210 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:55 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 289.62 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1237/1949) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (902/1237) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (358/712) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (63/152) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (652/1834) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 31% (4/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Yannick Maden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Yannick Maden
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Yannick Maden
40%
(
10 of
25)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Maden
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
76 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Yannick Maden
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Yannick Maden
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Yannick Maden
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nava Vs Maden Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
