Emina Bektas vs Quinn Gleason Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Bektas vs Q. Gleason

Emina Bektas
USA
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
2
Win
5
Played
3
Win
32
Age
30
-
Height
-
302
C. Rank
894
82
Best Rank
323
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$253.1K
Career Money
$4.3K
-
Plays
-

Quinn Gleason
USA
l
l
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
2
Win
5
Played
3
Win
32
Age
30
-
Height
-
302
C. Rank
894
82
Best Rank
323
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$253.1K
Career Money
$4.3K
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Bektas 2 - 3 Gleason
They have played 11 sets in total, with Emina Bektas winning 5 and Quinn Gleason winning 6. The last match between Emina Bektas and Quinn Gleason was at the W60 Arcadia, 02-03-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Emina Bektas getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Bektas | 2 |
| Gleason | 3 |
Last 5 H2H Matches:
(R1) W60 Arcadia(03-02-22)
Emina Bektas
6
6
Quinn Gleason
2
0
(R2) W25 Nishi-Tama(03-14-19)
Quinn Gleason
6
5
6
Emina Bektas
4
7
3
(R1) Honolulu(07-11-18)
Emina Bektas
6
6
Quinn Gleason
3
2
E. Bektas vs Q. Gleason H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $253,068 | Career Prize Money | $4,345 |
| 57.32% (278-207) | Career Total W/L | 54.84% (153-126) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 2 | Hard | 2 |
| 9 | Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 3 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Bektas vs Q. Gleason Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emina Bektas has won 40.43% of points on their second serve, while Quinn Gleason has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emina Bektas, in recent form, has won 41.92% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quinn Gleason has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.10% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Emina Bektas has saved 53.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quinn Gleason has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Emina Bektas has won 51.16% of matches played (W/L 22/21), with Quinn Gleason winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Emina Bektas has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 199/136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 15/23). Quinn Gleason has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 82/58), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Emina Bektas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 16/14), where as Quinn Gleason has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Emina Bektas winning 2 times and Quinn Gleason being victorious 3 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Emina Bektas winning 5 and Quinn Gleason winning 6.
- The last match between Emina Bektas and Quinn Gleason was at the W60 Arcadia, 02-03-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Emina Bektas getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:48.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emina Bektas has played against opponents with an average rank of 283.14 while Quinn Gleason has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emina Bektas has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quinn Gleason has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Emina Bektas has converted 35.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quinn Gleason has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Emina Bektas vs Quinn Gleason Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Bektas vs Q. Gleason H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 3 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 52 | Games Won | 49 |
| 25 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:37:48 | Average Match Time | 1:37:48 |
| 67% (242/363) | 1st Serve % | 74% (248/334) |
| 66% (160/242) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (147/248) |
| 43% (52/121) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (46/86) |
| 33% (15/46) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (14/37) |
| 42% (141/334) | Return Points Win % | 42% (151/363) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Bektas 46%, Gleason 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Bektas 51%, Gleason 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Bektas 58%, Gleason 0%.
E. Bektas Recent Matches Played
Q. Gleason Recent Matches Played

E. Bektas vs Q. Gleason Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.32% (278/207) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.84% (153/126) |
| 55.67% (619/493) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.40% (346/302) |
| 52.73% (5559/4983) | Games Win/Loss | 51.63% (3051/2858) |
| 59.40% (199/136) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.88% (55/49) |
| 39.47% (15/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.57% (82/58) |
| 57.50% (46/34) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.48% (16/17) |
| 56.25% (18/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2011 | Aces Total | 181 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 910 | Total Double Faults | 420 |
| 1:18:45 | Average Match Time | 1:17:20 |
| 471.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 508.94 |
| 67% (18900/28264) | 1st Serve % | 73% (10205/13914) |
| 68% (12772/18900) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (5863/10205) |
| 48% (4484/9365) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1697/3707) |
| 42% (1243/2970) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (778/1639) |
| 41% (11518/28358) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6187/13928) |
| 45.45% (10/12) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 35.71% (5/9) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.38% (21/31) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 59.59% (205/139) | Challenger W/L | 50.26% (98/97) |
| 69.81% (37/16) | Futures W/L | 71.62% (53/21) |
| 58% (274/476) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (146/271) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 56% (74/132) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (29/59) |
| 56% (83/149) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (49/94) |
| 87% (268/233) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (156/124) |
| 12% (268/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (156/32) |
| 20% (217/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (123/28) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
10:10 PM 07/11/25
PredictionW1
1.72
W2
1.99
12:00 PM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.615
W2
2.3
03:00 AM 08/11/25
PredictionW1
1.26
W2
3.45
12:00 PM 09/11/25
PredictionW1
1.25
W2
3.92
02:30 PM 08/11/25
PredictionW1
1.38
W2
2.76
08:05 PM 07/11/25
PredictionW1
1.084
W2
6.2
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
07 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Mary Stoiana Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 7th November 2025 Best Bets
07 Nov 2025
Julia Riera vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Tucuman Open – 7th November 2025 Best Bets
07 Nov 2025
Elizabeth Mandlik vs Renata Zarazua Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 7th November 2025 Best Bets
07 Nov 2025
Vitaliy Sachko vs Learner Tien Prediction – ATP Moselle Open – 7th November 2025 Best Bets
07 Nov 2025
Iva Jovic vs Mary Stoiana Prediction – WTA Austin 125 – 7th November 2025 Best Bets
07 Nov 2025
Marin Cilic vs Otto Virtanen Prediction – ATP Helsinki Challenger – 7th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:35
H2H 4-6
12:00
H2H 11-0
H2H 5-5
H2H 4-5
Tennis Events This Week
Hellenic Championship - Athens
Greece
Moselle Open - Metz
France
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Helsinki Challenger
Finland
Knoxville Challenger
United States
Lima 3 Challenger
Peru
Matsuyama Challenger
Japan
Taipei Challenger
Chinese Taipei
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Valledupar
Colombia
M25 East Lansing
United States
M25 Guadalajara
Mexico
M25 Montreal
Canada
M25 Santa Cruz do Sul
Brazil