Enola Chiesa vs Maelle Leclercq Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Jun at 10:47 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Chiesa vs M. Leclercq

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Chiesa 1 - 0 Leclercq
They have played 2 sets in total, with Enola Chiesa winning 2 and Maelle Leclercq winning 0. The last match between Enola Chiesa and Maelle Leclercq was at the W15 Norges-la-Ville, 12-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Enola Chiesa getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chiesa | 1 |
| Leclercq | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Norges-la-Ville(06-12-25)
E. Chiesa vs M. Leclercq H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.99% (170-157) | Career Total W/L | 55.93% (66-52) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Chiesa vs M. Leclercq Match Preview:
- Who performs better on their second serve? Leclercq excels with a second serve win rate of 39.74%, compared to Chiesa's 31.69%.
- Return game analysis: Leclercq has a clear advantage, winning 55.22% of opponents' second serve points, while Chiesa wins 49.83%.
- In contrast, Chiesa is more effective on first serve returns, securing 40.35% of points, whereas Leclercq achieves 30.88%.
- Both players show similar composure under pressure, with Leclercq saving breakpoints at 41.28% and Chiesa at 41.26%.
- Performance overview: Leclercq has had a superior year with a winning percentage of 69.44%, outstripping Chiesa's 51.22%.
- Which surface suits them best? Leclercq shines on Hard courts with a 70% win rate, and although it's also Chiesa's best surface, he lags behind with 57%.
- Regarding match levels: Leclercq dominates the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 74.19% of matches, over Chiesa's 57.14% success rate.
- Competition caliber: Leclercq has faced tougher opponents, with an average rank of 301.03, while Chiesa's competitors average a rank of 390.56.
- Deciding set outcomes favor Leclercq, who wins 60% of such sets, slightly better than Chiesa's 56% triumph rate.
- Break point opportunities are more frequently seized by Leclercq at 46.67%, in comparison to Chiesa's 38.76% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):
Leclercq presents a strong case for being the more likely victor in the upcoming match. His superior performance on second serve and return of second serve points indicates a critical edge in game dynamics.
His ability to face higher-ranked opponents and still maintain a heightened win percentage underscores his competitive strength. Additionally, Leclercq's historical success on Hard courts aligns well with this match setting, further bolstering his chances.
While both players handle pressure similarly, Leclercq's knack for converting key break points may become the decisive factor. These performance metrics and surface preferences position Leclercq as the prime candidate likely to win this upcoming match.
Enola Chiesa vs Maelle Leclercq Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Chiesa vs M. Leclercq H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:9:32 | Average Match Time | 1:9:32 |
| 77% (36/47) | 1st Serve % | 60% (32/53) |
| 72% (26/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (18/32) |
| 45% (5/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (6/21) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/5) |
| 55% (29/53) | Return Points Win % | 34% (16/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Chiesa Recent Matches Played
M. Leclercq Recent Matches Played

E. Chiesa vs M. Leclercq Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.99% (170/157) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.93% (66/52) |
| 52.71% (389/349) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.02% (141/120) |
| 50.64% (3459/3371) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (1257/1137) |
| 60.71% (17/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.38% (34/18) |
| 52.78% (152/136) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.92% (27/25) |
| 9.09% (1/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 151 | Aces Total | 191 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
| 583 | Total Double Faults | 495 |
| 1:13:57 | Average Match Time | 1:15:30 |
| 399.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 345.9 |
| 70% (10910/15609) | 1st Serve % | 59% (3576/6063) |
| 55% (5948/10910) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (2255/3576) |
| 42% (1964/4699) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1026/2487) |
| 49% (1027/2086) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (371/768) |
| 48% (7303/15191) | Return Points Win % | 46% (2837/6139) |
| 44.44% (52/65) | Challenger W/L | 37.04% (10/17) |
| 56.19% (118/92) | Futures W/L | 61.54% (56/35) |
| 52% (167/324) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (65/116) |
| 60% (30/50) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (8/15) |
| 40% (35/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (17/27) |
| 85% (174/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (63/58) |
| 15% (174/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (63/5) |
| 13% (152/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (55/8) |