Enzo Couacaud vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Couacaud vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Enzo Couacaud vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Couacaud has won 48.35% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Couacaud, in recent form, has won 47.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 49.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.89% and 30.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Couacaud has saved 61.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Couacaud has won 59.57% of matches played (W/L 28/ 19), with Kirchheimer winning 49.09% (W/L 27/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Couacaud has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 185/ 76), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 50/ 47). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Player level: In the last year, Couacaud has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 21/ 14), where as Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.24% of matches (W/L 19/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Couacaud winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Couacaud winning 2 and Kirchheimer winning 1. The last match between Couacaud and Kirchheimer was at the Columbus Challenger, 17-09-2019, Second, I.hard with Enzo Couacaud getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:53:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Couacaud and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Couacaud winning 1 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Couacaud winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Couacaud has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.51 while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 280.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Couacaud has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Couacaud has converted 40.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 41.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Couacaud 1 - 0 Kirchheimer
15
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
12
Minor
196
Rank
151
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
475
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
61% (342-216)
Career Total W/L
56% (272-210)
71% (15-6)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$698,440
Career Prize Money
$3,990
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Couacaud VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Enzo Couacaud | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:32 | 1:53:32 |
1st Serve % | 55% (42/77) | 73% (56/77) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (32/42) | 63% (35/56) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (18/35) | 48% (10/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 42% (32/77) | 35% (27/77) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Couacaud VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-6 7-5 6-0 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
73%
(
56 of
77)
9
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Enzo Couacaud | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 71% (15/6) | 42% (5/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 63% (33/19) | 47% (14/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (259/229) | 48% (134/148) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.6 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 143 | 54 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 70 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:20 | 1:53:28 |
Avg Opp Rank | 242.81 | 508.67 |
1st Serve % | 58% (864/1501) | 62% (567/920) |
1st Serve W% | 77% (662/864) | 70% (395/567) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (308/637) | 50% (176/353) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (62/153) | 38% (26/68) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (654/1629) | 35% (311/878) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 75% (15/5) | 45% (5/6) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (14/20) | 42% (5/12) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 50% (6/3) |
1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 50% (6/3) |
1st set L, W | 44% (9/4) | 33% (6/2) |
Enzo Couacaud Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
102)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
SF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gianluca Mager
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
31 of
66)
10
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Enzo Couacaud
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
14
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Andrea Collarini
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
94)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Emilio Gomez
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more