Eri Shimizu vs Alisa Kummel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Jun at 04:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Shimizu vs A. Kummel

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Shimizu 1 - 0 Kummel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Eri Shimizu winning 2 and Alisa Kummel winning 0. The last match between Eri Shimizu and Alisa Kummel was at the W35 Taipei, 26-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Eri Shimizu getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Shimizu | 1 |
Kummel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Taipei(06-26-25)
E. Shimizu vs A. Kummel H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$6,603 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
59.02% (193-134) | Career Total W/L | 55.62% (94-75) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
1 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Shimizu vs A. Kummel Match Preview:
- Could the difference in second serve performance be a crucial factor? Kummel has won 38.02% of points from his second serve while Shimizu has a higher success rate with 43.25% over the last six months.
- Kummel shows strength in return games with a 53.99% success rate on opponent's second serve, narrowly outperforming Shimizu's 52.07%.
- When facing first serve returns, Kummel and Shimizu have similar performances, scoring 34.81% and 34.08%, respectively.
- In terms of withstanding pressure, Kummel has saved 50% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Shimizu’s 45.45%.
- Looking at the past year, Kummel's match winning percentage stands at 58%, compared to Shimizu’s 55.17%.
- Regarding surface preference, Kummel excels on Hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Shimizu's best performance is on Indoor Hard, boasting a 73% win rate.
- What about the level of competition? Kummel and Shimizu have faced opponents with average rankings of 394.18 and 402.79, respectively, indicating similar levels of competition.
- In matches going to a deciding set, Kummel has a better track record winning 53% compared to Shimizu's 43% over the last 12 months.
- Shimizu has been more efficient in converting break points, achieving a 40.79% conversion rate versus Kummel's 35%.
Editorial Prediction (June 26, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the current data, Shimizu appears to have a slight edge in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, which are critical elements in tennis success. These statistics suggest that Shimizu can maintain pressure and take advantage of key opportunities.
However, Kummel's strengths in return games and his ability to save breakpoints could neutralize Shimizu's advantages. Furthermore, his resilience in deciding sets suggests that Kummel won't easily falter under pressure.
Considering the competitive nature of their match histories and surface preferences, Kummel’s slight edge on Hard courts could make a difference in this specific matchup.
Therefore, based on these analyses, Kummel is slightly favored to win this upcoming tennis match.
Eri Shimizu vs Alisa Kummel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Shimizu vs A. Kummel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 7 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
0:7:14 | Average Match Time | 0:7:14 |
86% (42/49) | 1st Serve % | 84% (42/50) |
64% (27/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (24/42) |
29% (2/7) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (3/8) |
50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (2/6) |
46% (23/50) | Return Points Win % | 41% (20/49) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Shimizu Recent Matches Played
A. Kummel Recent Matches Played

E. Shimizu vs A. Kummel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.02% (193/134) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.62% (94/75) |
57.68% (432/317) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.86% (209/172) |
53.07% (3666/3242) | Games Win/Loss | 52.10% (1833/1685) |
59.49% (141/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.65% (78/55) |
58.97% (23/16) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.75% (7/9) |
57.45% (27/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.00% (9/11) |
50.00% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
270 | Aces Total | 148 |
0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
550 | Total Double Faults | 767 |
1:29:4 | Average Match Time | 1:18:37 |
477.74 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.44 |
69% (12687/18407) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5950/9446) |
60% (7602/12687) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3547/5950) |
47% (2713/5720) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1483/3496) |
49% (1113/2270) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (644/1291) |
46% (8462/18565) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4457/9284) |
0.00% (0/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
55.31% (125/101) | Challenger W/L | 52.94% (27/24) |
68.69% (68/31) | Futures W/L | 56.78% (67/51) |
59% (193/327) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (92/167) |
49% (31/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (16/26) |
52% (49/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (22/45) |
88% (188/165) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (91/82) |
12% (188/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (91/9) |
20% (139/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (78/12) |