Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Eric Quigley vs Joe Salisbury Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Quigley vs Salisbury analysis and find out who is favored!
Eric Quigley vs Joe Salisbury Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Quigley has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Salisbury has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Quigley, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Salisbury has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Quigley has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Salisbury has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Quigley has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Salisbury winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Quigley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 120/ 96), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Salisbury has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 17/ 19).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Quigley winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Quigley winning 2 and Salisbury winning 0. The last match between Quigley and Salisbury was at the Knoxville Challenger, 07-11-2016, Q2 round, I.hard with Eric Quigley getting the victory 1100038878.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Quigley and Salisbury have played a deciding set 0 times, with Quigley winning 0 times and Salisbury 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Quigley winning 1, and Salisbury 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Quigley has played against opponents with an average rank of while Salisbury has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Quigley has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Salisbury has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Quigley has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Salisbury has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Quigley 1 - 0 Salisbury
Ret.
Rank
297
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
559
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
54% (197-171)
Career Total W/L
53% (81-73)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$9,365
Career Prize Money
$15,945
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Eric Quigley | Joe Salisbury |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:8 | 1:18:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (39/66) | 63% (46/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (28/39) | 72% (33/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 70% (19/27) | 44% (12/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (28/73) | 29% (19/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Eric Quigley
Player
Joe Salisbury
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Eric Quigley | Joe Salisbury |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Eric Quigley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Eric Quigley
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Harrison
Player
Eric Quigley
69%
(
83 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
10
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
John Lamble
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
115)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
27 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
41 of
115)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Eric Quigley
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
12
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Dominik Koepfer
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrew Harris
Player
Eric Quigley
79%
(
67 of
85)
1st Serve %
50%
(
59 of
118)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
10
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
48 of
118)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Quigley
Player
Keegan Smith
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Eric Quigley
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
107
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Eric Quigley
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Joe Salisbury Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Joe Salisbury
54%
(
57 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
3
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marinko Matosevic
Player
Joe Salisbury
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
25 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Salisbury
Player
Washi Gervais
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Joe Salisbury
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Salisbury
Player
Ki Su Jung
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
52 of
88)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Joe Salisbury
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Joe Salisbury
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joe Salisbury
Player
Karl Poling
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Quigley Vs Salisbury Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
