Eva Vedder vs Thaisa Grana Pedretti Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In terms of second serve performance over the past six months, Vedder has maintained a slightly superior edge by winning 43.73% of points, compared to Pedretti's 42.49%. This statistic often correlates highly with match prediction outcomes, providing insights into player performance.

Examining return games, Vedder has won 48.53% of their opponent's second serve points, slightly outperforming Pedretti, who stands at 47.62%. Meanwhile, Pedretti excels in first serve returns, securing 36.54% of points versus Vedder's 32.25%. These return stats are crucial when determining the favored player in this direct matchup.

Under pressure, specifically in saving breakpoints, Pedretti shows a minor edge with a 49.17% save rate, compared to Vedder's 47.06%. Breakpoint statistics can be pivotal for in-game betting predictions, revealing how each player handles high-pressure scenarios.

Overall performance in the last year presents Vedder with a 59.15% match win rate (42 wins, 29 losses), slightly ahead of Pedretti's 57.14% (16 wins, 12 losses). This provides an overarching view of their head-to-head potential, taking broader recent form into account.

Concerning surface performance, Vedder shines brightest on hard courts with a 59% win rate (80 wins, 56 losses), while Pedretti finds their sweet spot on indoor hard courts, boasting a 67% win rate (2 wins, 1 loss). Notably, grass and clay are their least favorable surfaces, respectively.

When analyzing match participation, Vedder has predominantly played in Challenger/ITF tournaments over $10K in the past year, securing a 60% win rate (36 wins, 24 losses). In contrast, Pedretti has recorded a 54.17% win rate (13 wins, 11 losses) in similar events. These statistics underscore each player's level of competition and event participation.

Regarding opponent caliber, Vedder has faced players with an average rank of 355.52, whereas Pedretti's opponents have had an average rank of 423.54 over the same period. This indicates Vedder has competed against slightly more formidable opponents on average.

In deciding sets, Pedretti emerges as a stronger contender, winning 67% of such sets, compared to Vedder's 48% success rate. This sets the stage for potential live betting predictions if the match extends to a deciding set.

Recent statistics on break point conversion reveal Pedretti's advantage, having converted 43.43% of break points relative to Vedder's 39.66%. Knowing who is more likely to convert these game-changing opportunities can significantly influence in-game betting strategies.

Upon evaluating these statistics across various dimensions, Pedretti seems slightly more poised for victory, predominantly due to their superiority in return games and breakpoint conversion prowess.