Evan Furness vs Jake VAN Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Furness vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Furness vs Jake VAN Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Furness has won 46.68% of points on his second serve, while Emburgh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Furness, in recent form, has won 52.75% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.57% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Furness has saved 55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Furness has won 50% of matches played (W/L 12/ 12), with Emburgh winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Furness has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 7/ 8), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Furness has played against opponents with an average rank of 210.5 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Furness has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Furness has converted 49.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Furness 0 - 0 Emburgh
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Evan Furness | Jake VAN Emburgh |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 56% (10/8) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 56% (22/17) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (189/178) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.22 | N/A |
Aces Total | 39 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.37 | N/A |
DFs Total | 66 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:39:16 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 210.17 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 60% (741/1238) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 63% (469/741) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (232/497) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (69/139) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 44% (525/1194) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (9/16) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | N/A |
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evan Furness
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Evan Furness
Player
Nikola Milojevic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henrique Rocha
Player
Evan Furness
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
46 of
68)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Evan Furness
Player
Alejandro Turriziani Alvarez
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Evan Furness
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jake VAN Emburgh Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Timothee Andriveau
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kyle Overmyer
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luc Koenig
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more