Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Evan Furness vs Quentin Halys Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Furness vs Halys analysis and find out who is favored!
Evan Furness vs Quentin Halys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Furness has won 45.89% of points on his second serve, while Halys has won 49.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Furness, in recent form, has won 51.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Halys has won 47.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.85% and 27.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Furness has saved 53.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Halys has saved 62.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Furness has won 50% of matches played (W/L 12/ 12), with Halys winning 44.19% (W/L 19/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Furness has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 72% (W/L 84/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Halys has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 128/ 93), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 97/ 89).
- Player level: In the last year, Furness has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6), where as Halys has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Furness winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Furness winning 3 and Halys winning 2. The last match between Furness and Halys was at the Orleans Challenger, 30-09-2022, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Quentin Halys getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:55.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Furness and Halys have played a deciding set 1 times, with Furness winning 0 times and Halys 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Furness winning 0, and Halys 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Furness has played against opponents with an average rank of 200.46 while Halys has played against players with an average rank of 222.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Furness has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Halys has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Furness has converted 49.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Halys has converted 35.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Furness 1 - 1 Halys
823
Rank
197
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
170
Rank
61
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
59% (287-199)
Career Total W/L
55% (369-297)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$5,730
Career Prize Money
$1,246,220
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Evan Furness | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 23 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 20 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:32:55 | 1:32:55 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (96/151) | 62% (89/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (66/96) | 74% (66/89) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (26/55) | 41% (22/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (55/143) | 39% (59/151) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Quentin Halys
Player
Evan Furness
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Quentin Halys
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Evan Furness | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (24/21) | 43% (22/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (211/209) | 49% (251/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.81 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 206 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:54 | 1:44:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 218.76 | 238.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (855/1415) | 56% (897/1589) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (541/855) | 78% (697/897) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (257/560) | 50% (344/692) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (75/153) | 35% (43/123) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (589/1364) | 35% (569/1629) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 54% (7/6) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Evan Furness Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Evan Furness
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Evan Furness
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Evan Furness
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
27 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(7) ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Tristan Lamasine
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Evan Furness
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Nikola Milojevic
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Quentin Halys
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Quentin Halys
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Quentin Halys
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
1
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
4
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Quentin Halys
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Jeff Wolf
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
113)
26
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Quentin Halys
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
45%
(
26 of
58)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Furness Vs Halys Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Evan Furness
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
