Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ezekiel Clark vs Mac Kiger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Clark vs Kiger analysis and find out who is favored!
Ezekiel Clark vs Mac Kiger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Clark has won 47.97% of points on his second serve, while Kiger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Clark, in recent form, has won 54.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kiger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Clark has saved 53.59% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kiger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Clark has won 49.12% of matches played (W/L 28/ 29), with Kiger winning 37.5% (W/L 3/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Clark has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 133/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 19/ 29). Kiger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 27/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 7/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Clark has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.98% of matches (W/L 25/ 16), where as Kiger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 3/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Clark winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Clark winning 2 and Kiger winning 0. The last match between Clark and Kiger was at the Cary Challenger, 11-09-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Ezekiel Clark getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Clark and Kiger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Clark winning 0 times and Kiger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Clark winning 0, and Kiger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Clark has played against opponents with an average rank of 135 while Kiger has played against players with an average rank of 207.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Clark has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kiger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Clark has converted 44.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kiger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Clark 1 - 0 Kiger
574
Rank
469
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
55% (162-134)
Career Total W/L
57% (53-40)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ezekiel Clark | Mac Kiger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:38 | 1:14:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (30/41) | 50% (29/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (22/30) | 62% (18/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (7/11) | 34% (10/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (30/58) | 29% (12/41) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Mac Kiger
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ezekiel Clark | Mac Kiger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (21/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (215/219) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.63 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (920/1352) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (599/920) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (215/432) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (60/133) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (545/1371) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Ezekiel Clark Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Ezekiel Clark
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
16
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Ozan Baris
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
40 of
48)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Ezekiel Clark
77%
(
89 of
115)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
51 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
93
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Louis Tessa
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Ezekiel Clark
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Lewie Lane
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Marc Ros Mesas
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mac Kiger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Mac Kiger
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Mac Kiger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
10
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Mac Kiger
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Mac Kiger
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mac Kiger
Player
Jonathan Sorbo
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Mac Kiger
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mac Kiger
Player
Jake Krug
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Mac Kiger
68%
(
63 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
13
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clark Vs Kiger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
