Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ezekiel Clark vs Victor Lilov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Clark vs Lilov analysis and find out who is favored!
Ezekiel Clark vs Victor Lilov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Clark has won 48.12% of points on his second serve, while Lilov has won 45.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Clark, in recent form, has won 54.65% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lilov has won 47.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.28% and 26.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Clark has saved 53.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lilov has saved 58.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Clark has won 53.23% of matches played (W/L 33/ 29), with Lilov winning 51.85% (W/L 28/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Clark has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 133/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 19/ 29). Lilov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 35/ 33).
- Player level: In the last year, Clark has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 30/ 16), where as Lilov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.05% of matches (W/L 20/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Clark winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Clark winning 4 and Lilov winning 1. The last match between Clark and Lilov was at the M15 Tacarigua, 23-04-2023, Final, Hard with Ezekiel Clark getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:55:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Clark and Lilov have played a deciding set 1 times, with Clark winning 1 times and Lilov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Clark winning 0, and Lilov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Clark has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.11 while Lilov has played against players with an average rank of 175.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Clark has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lilov has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Clark has converted 43.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lilov has converted 37.84% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Clark 2 - 0 Lilov
571
Rank
469
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
615
Rank
497
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
55% (162-134)
Career Total W/L
54% (76-66)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
22% (2-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ezekiel Clark | Victor Lilov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 23 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:21 | 1:55:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (93/119) | 54% (69/128) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (52/93) | 55% (38/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (15/26) | 44% (26/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (11/22) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (64/128) | 44% (52/119) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Victor Lilov
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
43 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 6-2 1-0 ret. |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Victor Lilov
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve %
46%
(
16 of
35)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
9 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ezekiel Clark | Victor Lilov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 22% (2/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (21/25) | 27% (6/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (215/219) | 42% (93/126) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.23 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 25 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:33 | 2:1:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 198.63 | 226 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (920/1352) | 58% (426/731) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (599/920) | 67% (284/426) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (215/432) | 47% (143/305) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (60/133) | 35% (18/51) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (545/1371) | 34% (238/690) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 42% (8/19) | 22% (2/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 13% (8/1) |
Ezekiel Clark Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Ezekiel Clark
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
16
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Ozan Baris
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
40 of
48)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Gorokhov
Player
Ezekiel Clark
77%
(
89 of
115)
1st Serve %
78%
(
61 of
78)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
51 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
93
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Louis Tessa
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrien Gobat
Player
Ezekiel Clark
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Lewie Lane
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Marc Ros Mesas
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Victor Lilov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Victor Lilov
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Ajeet Rai
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
3
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Lilov
Player
Elio Jose Ribeiro Lago
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
4
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
10
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
Victor Lilov
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
11
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mwendwa Mbithi
Player
Victor Lilov
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
49 of
60)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Victor Lilov
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
72 of
136)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
50 of
72)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
136)
118
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Frusina
Player
Victor Lilov
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Victor Lilov
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
14 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
Victor Lilov
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clark Vs Lilov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
