Fabian Marozsan vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marozsan vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Fabian Marozsan vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marozsan has won 49.92% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marozsan, in recent form, has won 53.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.19% and 25.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marozsan has saved 59.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marozsan has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marozsan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 45/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Marozsan has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 80% of matches (W/L 16/ 4), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Marozsan winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Marozsan winning 5 and Ilkel winning 3. The last match between Marozsan and Ilkel was at the Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger, 26-01-2023, Second, I.hard with Fabian Marozsan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marozsan and Ilkel have played a deciding set 2 times, with Marozsan winning 1 times and Ilkel 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Marozsan winning 0, and Ilkel 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marozsan has played against opponents with an average rank of 227.63 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 236.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marozsan has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marozsan has converted 40.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 44.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marozsan 2 - 1 Ilkel
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
37
Rank
37
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor1
0
Grass0
418
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
64% (240-134)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$1,063,185
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Fabian Marozsan | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
Sets Won | 5 | 3 |
Games Won | 47 | 36 |
Aces (Total) | 18 | 24 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:32 | 1:42:32 |
1st Serve % | 70% (178/254) | 67% (165/247) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (135/178) | 76% (126/165) |
2nd Serve Win% | 46% (35/76) | 38% (31/82) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (11/25) | 45% (5/11) |
Return Points W% | 36% (90/247) | 33% (84/254) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Cem Ilkel
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
11
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
23 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
7-6(2) 5-7 6-4 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Fabian Marozsan
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
11
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
83%
(
55 of
66)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
30%
(
30 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
112)
113
Total Points Won
98
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Fabian Marozsan | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 44% (8/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 54% (29/25) | 43% (17/23) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (255/246) | 46% (165/195) |
Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 43% (3/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.54 |
Aces Total | 92 | 94 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 46 | 42 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:44 | 1:28:14 |
Avg Opp Rank | 136.73 | 162.39 |
1st Serve % | 67% (1065/1596) | 57% (616/1073) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (739/1065) | 72% (442/616) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (268/531) | 46% (210/457) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (58/147) | 43% (32/74) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (590/1570) | 36% (378/1044) |
Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 41% (7/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 80% (4/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 75% (8/6) |
1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 25% (8/2) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Fabian Marozsan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 |
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Fabian Marozsan
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Luca Van Assche
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Alexander Zverev
Player
Fabian Marozsan
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
6
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Alex De Minaur
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Alexei Popyrin
82%
(
58 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Holger Rune
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Fabian Marozsan
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Nicolas Jarry
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
63 of
120)
4
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more