Facundo Mena vs Emilio Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Emilio Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.95% of points on his second serve, while Nava has won 49.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.56% and 27.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 62.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 67.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 68.12% of matches played (W/L 47/ 22), with Nava winning 61.04% (W/L 47/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 62/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10), where as Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mena winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mena winning 2 and Nava winning 2. The last match between Mena and Nava was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 03-11-2022, Second, I.hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:57:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Nava have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mena winning 0 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 0, and Nava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.97 while Nava has played against players with an average rank of 284.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 48.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 39.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mena 1 - 1 Nava
12
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
401
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
57% (459-351)
Career Total W/L
60% (170-113)
65% (17-9)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$402,385
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Facundo Mena | Emilio Nava |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 15 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 0:57:52 | 0:57:52 |
1st Serve % | 57% (46/81) | 68% (51/75) |
1st Serve Win% | 67% (31/46) | 55% (28/51) |
2nd Serve Win% | 37% (13/35) | 25% (6/24) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (8/8) | 78% (7/9) |
Return Points W% | 55% (41/75) | 46% (37/81) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Facundo Mena
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
6-0 6-1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Emilio Nava
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
8 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Facundo Mena | Emilio Nava |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 65% (17/9) | 62% (16/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 64% (36/20) | 59% (35/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (282/205) | 53% (320/285) |
Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 61% (11/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.71 |
Aces Total | 103 | 210 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 56 | 72 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:47 | 1:43:55 |
Avg Opp Rank | 360.31 | 289.62 |
1st Serve % | 56% (791/1419) | 63% (1237/1949) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (578/791) | 73% (902/1237) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (325/628) | 50% (358/712) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (90/172) | 41% (63/152) |
Return Pts W% | 45% (695/1558) | 36% (652/1834) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 60% (6/4) |
Futures W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 62% (16/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 31% (4/13) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 57% (4/7) |
1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 93% (15/14) |
1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 7% (15/1) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 18% (11/2) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Facundo Mena
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Kousuke Ogura
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Facundo Mena
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Skander Mansouri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Arjun Kadhe
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Facundo Mena
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
51)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matias Soto
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Facundo Mena
Player
Alafia Ayeni
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more