Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Facundo Mena vs Vit Kopriva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mena vs Kopriva analysis and find out who is favored!
Facundo Mena vs Vit Kopriva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mena has won 51.95% of points on his second serve, while Kopriva has won 42.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mena, in recent form, has won 55.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kopriva has won 52.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.56% and 31.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mena has saved 62.25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kopriva has saved 58.43% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mena has won 68.12% of matches played (W/L 47/ 22), with Kopriva winning 58.46% (W/L 38/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 243/ 158), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10), where as Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 28/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mena winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mena winning 1 and Kopriva winning 2. The last match between Mena and Kopriva was at the Bendigo Challenger, 06-01-2022, Third, Hard with Vit Kopriva getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mena and Kopriva have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mena winning 0 times and Kopriva 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mena winning 0, and Kopriva 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mena has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.97 while Kopriva has played against players with an average rank of 272.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mena has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kopriva has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mena has converted 48.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kopriva has converted 49.65% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mena 0 - 1 Kopriva
401
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
119
Rank
111
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (459-351)
Career Total W/L
59% (340-236)
65% (17-9)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$140,110
Career Prize Money
$319,625
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Facundo Mena | Vit Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 15 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:29 | 2:36:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (62/107) | 57% (54/95) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (50/62) | 78% (42/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (20/45) | 61% (25/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 29% (28/95) | 35% (37/107) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(11) 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Vit Kopriva
Player
Facundo Mena
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
11
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
50 of
62)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Facundo Mena | Vit Kopriva |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (17/9) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (36/20) | 53% (27/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (282/205) | 50% (246/242) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 56% (9/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (14/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 103 | 84 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.42 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:47 | 1:39:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 360.31 | 239.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (791/1419) | 62% (931/1497) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (578/791) | 70% (648/931) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (325/628) | 44% (249/566) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (90/172) | 49% (67/138) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (695/1558) | 39% (579/1467) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 38% (3/5) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 17% (12/2) |
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Paulo Andre Saraiva Dos Santos
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kousuke Ogura
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
7
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Facundo Mena
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Skander Mansouri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
7
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
31 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Arjun Kadhe
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Facundo Mena
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
37%
(
19 of
51)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Alafia Ayeni
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Martin Landaluce
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Jeff Wolf
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Rei Sakamoto
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
3
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Vit Kopriva
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(4) 6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Vit Kopriva
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mena Vs Kopriva Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Facundo Mena
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
