Faisal Qamar vs Parth Aggarwal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Qamar vs Aggarwal analysis and find out who is favored!
Faisal Qamar vs Parth Aggarwal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qamar has won 44% of points on his second serve, while Aggarwal has won 50.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qamar, in recent form, has won 46.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Aggarwal has won 48.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.27% and 32.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Qamar has saved 47.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aggarwal has saved 56.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Qamar has won 40% of matches played (W/L 6/ 9), with Aggarwal winning 47.83% (W/L 22/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Qamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 55/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Aggarwal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 18/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Qamar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 6/ 9), where as Aggarwal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Qamar winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Qamar winning 2 and Aggarwal winning 0. The last match between Qamar and Aggarwal was at the M15 New Delhi, 28-03-2021, Q1 round, Hard with Faisal Qamar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Qamar and Aggarwal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Qamar winning 0 times and Aggarwal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Qamar winning 0, and Aggarwal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qamar has played against opponents with an average rank of 12.33 while Aggarwal has played against players with an average rank of 45.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qamar has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aggarwal has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Qamar has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aggarwal has converted 38.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Qamar 1 - 0 Aggarwal
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (71-57)
Career Total W/L
32% (36-77)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Faisal Qamar | Parth Aggarwal |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Faisal Qamar | Parth Aggarwal |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 53% (9/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 57% (21/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (77/70) | 54% (184/155) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 29% (2/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 2 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 8 | 25 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 94.24 |
1st Serve % | 62% (86/139) | 56% (296/528) |
1st Serve W% | 60% (52/86) | 59% (176/296) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (26/53) | 50% (117/232) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (5/15) | 37% (22/59) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (58/144) | 39% (186/474) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 56% (9/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 53% (9/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/3) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 75% (12/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 25% (12/3) |
1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Faisal Qamar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Faisal Qamar
47%
(
34 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
9
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Faisal Qamar
Player
Jiayang Dong
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 4-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Vishnu Vardhan
Player
Faisal Qamar
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Faisal Qamar
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
8 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Faisal Qamar
Player
Ha Minh Duc Vu
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Parth Aggarwal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ruslan Kastsiukevich
Player
Parth Aggarwal
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
83)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-4 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Parth Aggarwal
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Palan
Player
Parth Aggarwal
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Parth Aggarwal
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Parth Aggarwal
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Parth Aggarwal
Player
Enrico Baldisserri
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more