Prediction of Fay Muller vs Margaret Hellyer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
F. Muller vs M. Hellyer

Fay Muller

AUS

5

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Margaret Hellyer

AUS

5

Win

Played

3

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Muller 5 - 3 Hellyer

They have played 18 sets in total, with Fay Muller winning 11 and Margaret Hellyer winning 7. The last match between Fay Muller and Margaret Hellyer was at the Brisbane, 28-10-1960, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Fay Muller getting the victory 6-2 8-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Muller	5
Hellyer	3

Last 8 H2H Matches:

() Brisbane(10-28-60)

Stats

Fay Muller

Margaret Hellyer

() Brisbane(10-29-59)

Stats

Fay Muller

Margaret Hellyer

(R4) Sydney(11-06-57)

Stats

Margaret Hellyer

Fay Muller

F. Muller vs M. Hellyer H2H Profile

F. Muller	Stats	M. Hellyer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.02% (123-89)	Career Total W/L	56.31% (165-128)
5	Grass	3
5	Total H2H Matches	3
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

F. Muller vs M. Hellyer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fay Muller has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Margaret Hellyer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fay Muller, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Margaret Hellyer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Fay Muller has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Margaret Hellyer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Fay Muller has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Margaret Hellyer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Fay Muller has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 63% (W/L 12/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 26/26). Margaret Hellyer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 7/2), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 54% (W/L 15/13).
Player level: In the last year, Fay Muller has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Margaret Hellyer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 8 times before with Fay Muller winning 5 times and Margaret Hellyer being victorious 3 times. They have played 18 sets in total, with Fay Muller winning 11 and Margaret Hellyer winning 7.
The last match between Fay Muller and Margaret Hellyer was at the Brisbane, 28-10-1960, Round: , Surface: Grass, with Fay Muller getting the victory 6-2 8-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Fay Muller and Margaret Hellyer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Fay Muller winning 1 times and Margaret Hellyer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fay Muller has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Margaret Hellyer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fay Muller has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Margaret Hellyer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Fay Muller has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Margaret Hellyer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Fay Muller vs Margaret Hellyer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Muller vs M. Hellyer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

F. Muller	Stats	M. Hellyer
5	H2H Matches Won	3
11	Sets Won	7
90	Games Won	79
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
63% (5/8)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	38% (3/8)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (1/2)
83% (5/6)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
17% (1/6)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (1/6)

Recent Performance Stats

F. Muller Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Championships - 10-01-1963
R3 Joan GibsonJ. Gibson	L	8-6 6-2	Stats
Melbourne - 06-12-1962
R3 Trish McclenaughanT. Mcclenaughan	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
R2 Pat TurnerP. Turner	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
R4 Robyn EbbernR. Ebbern	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Sydney - 22-11-1962
R4 Jan LehaneJ. Lehane	L	6-4 6-0	Stats

View All

M. Hellyer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Le Zoute - 15-08-1962
F Rita BentleyR. Bentley	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
SF Renata OstermannR. Ostermann	W	6-0 4-6 6-3	Stats
M RucquoisM. Rucquois	W	0-6 6-1 6-3	Stats
Geneva - 02-08-1962
F Paule CourteixP. Courteix	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Montana - 09-07-1962
SF M T BolzanoM. T	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

F. Muller vs M. Hellyer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

F. Muller	Stats	M. Hellyer
58.02% (123/89)	YTD Win/Loss	56.31% (165/128)
58.30% (274/196)	Sets Win/Loss	55.09% (357/291)
54.21% (2322/1961)	Games Win/Loss	100.00% (3087/0)
0% (0/0)	Hard Win/Loss	77.78% (7/2)
50.00% (26/26)	Clay Win/Loss	56.30% (76/59)
50.00% (1/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
60.43% (84/55)	Grass Win/Loss	55.46% (66/53)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
53.66% (22/19)	Slam W/L	45.16% (14/17)
58% (120/208)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (159/283)
37% (20/54)	Deciding Set Win %	52% (41/79)
84% (128/107)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (157/138)
16% (128/21)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (157/19)
16% (80/13)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	17% (129/22)