Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Campana vs Samuel MARTINEZ Arjona Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Campana vs Arjona analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Campana vs Samuel MARTINEZ Arjona Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Campana has won 50.26% of points on his second serve, while Arjona has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Campana, in recent form, has won 56.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Arjona has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.8% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Campana has saved 59.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arjona has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Campana has won 55.36% of matches played (W/L 31/ 25), with Arjona winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Campana has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 107/ 79), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 107/ 79). Arjona has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Campana has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.36% of matches (W/L 31/ 25), where as Arjona has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Campana has played against opponents with an average rank of 66.63 while Arjona has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Campana has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arjona has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Campana has converted 43.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arjona has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Campana 0 - 0 Arjona
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Campana | Samuel MARTINEZ Arjona |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (136/104) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 15 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:16 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (276/488) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (179/276) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (99/212) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (33/75) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (245/518) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 64% (7/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 1st Match |
Federico Campana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
Player
Federico Campana
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Yerassyl Yerdilda
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
85%
(
44 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Artem Sidorov
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
76%
(
42 of
55)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michel Hopp
Player
Federico Campana
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(4) 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anthony Genov
Player
Federico Campana
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Federico Campana
46%
(
49 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
47%
(
27 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Ignacio Parisca
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Campana
Player
Andrea Fiorentini
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
view more
Samuel MARTINEZ Arjona Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Samuel Martinez Arjona
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 0-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Campana Vs Arjona Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
