Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Gaio vs Tim Van Rijthoven Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gaio vs Rijthoven analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Gaio vs Tim Van Rijthoven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 48.88% of points on his second serve, while Rijthoven has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 48.35% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rijthoven has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 58.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rijthoven has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 24/ 30), with Rijthoven winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 323/ 250), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.67% of matches (W/L 21/ 24), where as Rijthoven has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gaio winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gaio winning 3 and Rijthoven winning 2. The last match between Gaio and Rijthoven was at the Biella 1 Challenger, 11-02-2021, Second, I.hard with Federico Gaio getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Rijthoven have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gaio winning 0 times and Rijthoven 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Rijthoven 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.15 while Rijthoven has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rijthoven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 32.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rijthoven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gaio 1 - 1 Rijthoven
247
Rank
124
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
871
Rank
101
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
54% (515-433)
Career Total W/L
62% (234-141)
21% (3-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$392,005
Career Prize Money
$499,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Federico Gaio | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 28 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 13 | 17 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:43 | 1:39:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (82/140) | 60% (96/161) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 87% (71/82) | 75% (72/96) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (35/58) | 55% (36/65) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (4/12) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (53/161) | 24% (34/140) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Federico Gaio
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
11
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
7
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
44 of
52)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
27 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Gaio | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 21% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 24% (8/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (123/182) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:26 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.07 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (538/965) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (359/538) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (200/427) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (22/71) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 33% (326/977) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 15% (2/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Federico Gaio
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
75)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
6
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
10
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blaise Bicknell
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
7
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
35 of
44)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Federico Gaio
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Federico Gaio
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Federico Gaio
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Karan Singh
43%
(
38 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
31 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Federico Gaio
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
12
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Federico Gaio
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gaio Vs Rijthoven Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
