Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Federico Iannaccone vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Iannaccone vs Carabelli analysis and find out who is favored!
Federico Iannaccone vs Camilo UGO Carabelli Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Iannaccone has won 48.49% of points on his second serve, while Carabelli has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Iannaccone, in recent form, has won 55.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Carabelli has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.2% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Iannaccone has saved 59.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carabelli has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Iannaccone has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 42/ 30), with Carabelli winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Iannaccone has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 51/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8). Carabelli has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Iannaccone has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17), where as Carabelli has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Iannaccone has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.01 while Carabelli has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Iannaccone has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carabelli has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Iannaccone has converted 51.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carabelli has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Iannaccone 0 - 0 Carabelli
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Iannaccone VS Carabelli H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Federico Iannaccone | Camilo UGO Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (31/26) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (281/240) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.09 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 24 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 311.61 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (1176/1683) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (740/1176) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (247/507) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (102/192) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (754/1705) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 70% (10/7) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 30% (10/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 1st Match |
Federico Iannaccone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Andrea Picchione
Player
Federico Iannaccone
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(5) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nikola Milojevic
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Federico Iannaccone
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Federico Iannaccone
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
48 of
96)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Toby Alex Kodat
72%
(
73 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Federico Iannaccone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Steven Diez
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Ignasi Forcano
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Federico Iannaccone
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
79%
(
65 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo UGO Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Luis Britto
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve %
61%
(
20 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
6 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
35
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Iannaccone Vs Carabelli Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
