Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Felix Corwin vs Fletcher Scott Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Corwin vs Scott analysis and find out who is favored!
Felix Corwin vs Fletcher Scott Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Corwin has won 47.17% of points on his second serve, while Scott has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Corwin, in recent form, has won 51.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Scott has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.12% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Corwin has saved 59.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Scott has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Corwin has won 65% of matches played (W/L 39/ 21), with Scott winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Corwin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 137/ 93). Scott has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 23/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Corwin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66% of matches (W/L 33/ 17), where as Scott has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Corwin winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Corwin winning 4 and Scott winning 2. The last match between Corwin and Scott was at the M15 Naples, 25-02-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Felix Corwin getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:28:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Corwin and Scott have played a deciding set 2 times, with Corwin winning 2 times and Scott 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Corwin winning 0, and Scott 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Corwin has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.7 while Scott has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Corwin has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Scott has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Corwin has converted 41.7% of breakpoint opportunities, and Scott has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Corwin 2 - 0 Scott
714
Rank
478
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
60% (218-147)
Career Total W/L
54% (76-65)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Felix Corwin | Fletcher Scott |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:28:30 | 2:28:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (99/177) | 67% (108/161) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (71/99) | 63% (68/108) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (32/78) | 43% (23/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 28% (7/25) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (70/161) | 42% (74/177) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Felix Corwin
Player
Fletcher Scott
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 6-2 1-6 6-4 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Fletcher Scott
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Felix Corwin | Fletcher Scott |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (26/25) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (249/241) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 94 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:18 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 148.7 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (882/1574) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (615/882) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (318/692) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (75/188) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (688/1628) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (8/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Felix Corwin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Jacob Brumm
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ezequiel Simonit
51%
(
59 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
45%
(
25 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ivan Denisov
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Garrett Johns
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
51 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
117
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Felix Corwin
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
41%
(
26 of
63)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anthony Genov
Player
Felix Corwin
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
104)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Fletcher Scott Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Petrov
Player
Fletcher Scott
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Fletcher Scott
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alfredo Perez
Player
Fletcher Scott
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Duarte Vale
Player
Fletcher Scott
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Elijah Strode
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Fletcher Scott
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maciej Rajski
Player
Fletcher Scott
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
28 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Fletcher Scott
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
81%
(
34 of
42)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fletcher Scott
Player
Cihan Akay
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Corwin Vs Scott Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
