Filip Misolic vs Chun Hsin Tseng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 06:21 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Misolic vs C. Hsin Tseng

 AUT
1
Win
Played
1
Win

 TPE
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Misolic 1 - 1 Tseng
They have played 6 sets in total, with Filip Misolic winning 3 and Chun Hsin Tseng winning 3. The last match between Chun Hsin Tseng and Filip Misolic was at the Bratislava 2 Challenger, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Draw getting the victory 1-6 7-6(4) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Misolic | 1 | 
| Tseng | 1 | 
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Bratislava 2 Challenger(10-28-25)
(R1) Antalya 3 Challenger(11-30-21)
F. Misolic vs C. H. Tseng H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $644,425 | Career Prize Money | $394,315 | 
| 62.35% (212-128) | Career Total W/L | 57.36% (269-200) | 
| 1 | Clay | 0 | 
| 0 | Indoor | 1 | 
| 10 | Titles | 10 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 | 
| 50.00% (9-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.32% (5-14) | 
F. Misolic vs C. H. Tseng Match Preview:
- Filip Misolic shows a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 46.11% of points compared to Chun Hsin Tseng's 45.07%. Could this give Misolic a critical advantage?
- In terms of return games, Misolic again leads, capturing 45.91% of opponents' second serve points, while Tseng claims 42.65%.
- For first serve return points, Misolic retains an edge with 27.01% won, surpassing Tseng's 24.96%.
- Despite Misolic's slight disadvantage in break point saves, with 56.92% compared to Tseng's 62.39%, he excels in overall match performance, winning 67.95% over the last year against Tseng’s 46.03%.
- Both players share their best surface win percentage on clay at 68%, yet Tseng struggles more on grass, with a win rate of 14%.
- Misolic has participated in more Challengers/ITF matches, winning 69.57%, while Tseng managed a respectable 60.87% in similar events.
- Their past head-to-head encounter favored Misolic, with a previous victory in a three-set match.
- Misolic has faced slightly lower-ranked opponents over the past year, affecting the perceived difficulty of his wins.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Misolic's previous success rate of 70% makes him a strong contender, compared to Tseng's 38%.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
Filip Misolic demonstrates a consistent edge in various performance metrics, including second serve points won and return game effectiveness. Despite Chun Hsin Tseng's competency in saving breakpoints, Misolic's higher match win percentage and advantage in deciding sets likely overshadow this strength.
Both players perform strongest on clay, indicating a potentially even playing ground in terms of surface. However, Misolic's experience in head-to-head matches, where he previously secured a win, also lends him an advantage.
Given these factors, Filip Misolic emerges as the likely winner for the upcoming match, benefiting from better overall match performance and a favorable history against Tseng.
Filip Misolic vs Chun Hsin Tseng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Misolic vs C. H. Tseng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 | 
| 34 | Games Won | 29 | 
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 6 | 
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 2:45:18 | Average Match Time | 2:45:18 | 
| 64% (143/224) | 1st Serve % | 71% (170/240) | 
| 71% (102/143) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (99/170) | 
| 44% (36/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (38/70) | 
| 31% (9/29) | Break Pts Won % | 32% (7/22) | 
| 43% (103/240) | Return Points Win % | 38% (86/224) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) | 
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) | 
Recent Performance Stats
F. Misolic Recent Matches Played
C. H. Tseng Recent Matches Played

F. Misolic vs C. H. Tseng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.35% (212/128) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.36% (269/200) | 
| 57.77% (461/337) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.51% (615/493) | 
| 52.69% (4018/3608) | Games Win/Loss | 52.16% (5423/4973) | 
| 43.75% (21/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.91% (104/82) | 
| 67.87% (169/80) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.57% (141/88) | 
| 51.35% (19/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.94% (23/24) | 
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 14.29% (1/6) | 
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 | 
| 904 | Aces Total | 1220 | 
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 | 
| 795 | Total Double Faults | 1120 | 
| 1:35:8 | Average Match Time | 1:43:20 | 
| 362.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.36 | 
| 58% (13332/22790) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19007/32187) | 
| 68% (9058/13332) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (12871/19007) | 
| 51% (4785/9458) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6752/13180) | 
| 44% (995/2276) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1412/3390) | 
| 40% (8982/22225) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13180/32354) | 
| 60.00% (15/10) | Slam W/L | 31.58% (6/13) | 
| 33.33% (2/4) | Masters W/L | 39.13% (9/14) | 
| 100.00% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 57.14% (8/6) | 
| 59.26% (32/22) | Main Tour W/L | 30.95% (13/29) | 
| 59.74% (92/62) | Challenger W/L | 59.85% (164/110) | 
| 69.70% (69/30) | Futures W/L | 71.13% (69/28) | 
| 63% (205/328) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (263/447) | 
| 63% (5/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 7% (1/15) | 
| 62% (64/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (65/138) | 
| 68% (75/110) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (84/158) | 
| 90% (189/170) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (267/224) | 
| 10% (189/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (267/43) | 
| 27% (150/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (202/45) | 












