Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Finn Tearney vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tearney vs Findel-Hawkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Finn Tearney vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tearney has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tearney, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tearney has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tearney has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Findel-Hawkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tearney has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 136/ 93). Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tearney winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tearney winning 2 and Findel-Hawkins winning 0. The last match between Tearney and Findel-Hawkins was at the M25 Barnstaple, 11-02-2019, Q1 round, I.hard with Finn Tearney getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tearney and Findel-Hawkins have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tearney winning 0 times and Findel-Hawkins 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tearney winning 0, and Findel-Hawkins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tearney has played against opponents with an average rank of while Findel-Hawkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tearney has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tearney has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tearney 1 - 0 Findel-Hawkins
Ret.
Rank
356
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
60% (148-99)
Career Total W/L
59% (70-49)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tearney VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Finn Tearney | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (61/86) | 56% (40/71) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (40/61) | 65% (26/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (13/25) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 13% (1/8) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (31/71) | 38% (33/86) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Tearney VS Findel-Hawkins H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Finn Tearney
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Finn Tearney | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Finn Tearney Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Tearney
Player
Anton Shepp
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Finn Tearney
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Tearney
Player
Ching Ho Sunny Yue
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Finn Tearney
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Harry Bourchier
Player
Finn Tearney
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
17
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Finn Tearney
Player
Rishab Agarwal
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Gueydan
Player
Finn Tearney
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tearney Vs Findel-Hawkins Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
