Finn Tearney vs Naoki Nakagawa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tearney vs Nakagawa analysis and find out who is favored!
Finn Tearney vs Naoki Nakagawa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tearney has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nakagawa has won 50.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tearney, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakagawa has won 45.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tearney has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakagawa has saved 61.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tearney has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nakagawa winning 62.5% (W/L 30/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tearney has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 136/ 93). Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tearney winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tearney winning 2 and Nakagawa winning 1. The last match between Tearney and Nakagawa was at the Gatineau Challenger, 15-07-2017, Q1 round, Hard with Finn Tearney getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:40:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tearney and Nakagawa have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tearney winning 1 times and Nakagawa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tearney winning 0, and Nakagawa 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tearney has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nakagawa has played against players with an average rank of 209.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tearney has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakagawa has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tearney has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakagawa has converted 46.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tearney 1 - 0 Nakagawa
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Ret.
Rank
356
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
424
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
60% (148-99)
Career Total W/L
61% (295-192)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$4,555
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Finn Tearney | Naoki Nakagawa |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:40:16 | 2:40:16 |
1st Serve % | 65% (62/95) | 50% (59/118) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (41/62) | 51% (30/59) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (16/33) | 46% (27/59) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 67% (4/6) |
Return Points W% | 52% (61/118) | 40% (38/95) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
59 of
118)
0
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
4
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
61 of
118)
118
Total Points Won
95
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Finn Tearney | Naoki Nakagawa |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (4/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (45/48) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 0 | 18 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:52:49 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 112.75 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 52% (154/295) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (108/154) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (67/141) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (11/28) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (110/294) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Finn Tearney Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Anton Shepp
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Finn Tearney
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Ching Ho Sunny Yue
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Finn Tearney
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Harry Bourchier
Player
Finn Tearney
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
17
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Rishab Agarwal
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Quentin Gueydan
Player
Finn Tearney
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H |
view more
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more