Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Flavio Cobolli vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cobolli vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Flavio Cobolli vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cobolli has won 51.57% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cobolli, in recent form, has won 48.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.85% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cobolli has saved 64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 54.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cobolli has won 63.04% of matches played (W/L 58/ 34), with Ilkel winning 39.58% (W/L 19/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cobolli has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 39/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 254/ 162), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Cobolli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.27% of matches (W/L 31/ 18), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cobolli winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cobolli winning 2 and Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Cobolli and Ilkel was at the Rome 2 Challenger, 01-05-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Flavio Cobolli getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cobolli and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cobolli winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cobolli winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cobolli has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.23 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 237.9.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cobolli has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cobolli has converted 39.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 45.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cobolli 1 - 0 Ilkel
62
Rank
62
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
415
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
57% (164-123)
Career Total W/L
56% (400-309)
63% (17-10)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$528,535
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Flavio Cobolli | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:2 | 1:29:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (36/57) | 65% (48/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (22/36) | 54% (26/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 35% (9/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (39/74) | 42% (24/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Cem Ilkel
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Flavio Cobolli | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (17/10) | 44% (8/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (38/32) | 43% (17/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (329/315) | 46% (165/195) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 122 | 94 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 76 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:3 | 1:28:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.07 | 162.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1055/1939) | 57% (616/1073) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (753/1055) | 72% (442/616) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (456/884) | 46% (210/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (77/193) | 43% (32/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (802/2041) | 36% (378/1044) |
| Slam W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 41% (7/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 75% (8/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 25% (8/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (14/5) | 20% (10/2) |
Flavio Cobolli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Flavio Cobolli
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
96%
(
27 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cameron Norrie
Player
Flavio Cobolli
70%
(
66 of
94)
1st Serve %
48%
(
60 of
124)
11
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
44 of
60)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
27 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Flavio Cobolli
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Flavio Cobolli
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Constant Lestienne
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Brandon Holt
43%
(
37 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
59%
(
29 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Cobolli Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Flavio Cobolli
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
