Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Francisco Comesana vs Lenny Hampel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Comesana vs Hampel analysis and find out who is favored!
Francisco Comesana vs Lenny Hampel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Comesana has won 51.71% of points on his second serve, while Hampel has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Comesana, in recent form, has won 50.22% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hampel has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.39% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Comesana has saved 58.02% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hampel has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Comesana has won 67.5% of matches played (W/L 54/ 26), with Hampel winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Comesana has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 224/ 114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hampel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 172/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Comesana has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.31% of matches (W/L 47/ 18), where as Hampel has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Comesana winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Comesana winning 2 and Hampel winning 0. The last match between Comesana and Hampel was at the M25 Kottingbrunn, 24-07-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Francisco Comesana getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Comesana and Hampel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Comesana winning 0 times and Hampel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Comesana winning 0, and Hampel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Comesana has played against opponents with an average rank of 307.65 while Hampel has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Comesana has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hampel has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Comesana has converted 37.69% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hampel has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Comesana 1 - 0 Hampel
115
Rank
114
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
359
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
65% (236-128)
Career Total W/L
60% (255-171)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$88,375
Career Prize Money
$6,945
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Francisco Comesana | Lenny Hampel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) | 66% (44/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (33/43) | 66% (29/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 43% (10/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (28/67) | 31% (20/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Francisco Comesana
Player
Lenny Hampel
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Francisco Comesana | Lenny Hampel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (25/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (229/217) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (9/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 254.95 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (846/1374) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (610/846) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (271/528) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (56/150) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (558/1423) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Francisco Comesana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Elias Ymer
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
96)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
Player
Francisco Comesana
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Philip Sekulic
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
63 of
94)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Francisco Comesana
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Francisco Comesana
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Ignacio Buse
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lenny Hampel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Tim Sandkaulen
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Andre Biro
49%
(
17 of
35)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
13 of
17)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Lenny Hampel
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Stodder
Player
Lenny Hampel
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Matic Dimic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Lenny Hampel
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
52
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 0-6 10-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
Neil Oberleitner
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Comesana Vs Hampel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Francisco Comesana
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
