Francisco Vittar vs Parth Aggarwal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vittar vs Aggarwal analysis and find out who is favored!
Francisco Vittar vs Parth Aggarwal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vittar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Aggarwal has won 50.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vittar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Aggarwal has won 45.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vittar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aggarwal has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vittar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Aggarwal winning 47.83% (W/L 22/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vittar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 38/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Aggarwal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 18/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vittar winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Vittar winning 2 and Aggarwal winning 1. The last match between Vittar and Aggarwal was at the M15 Lubbock, 28-09-2021, Q3, Hard with Francisco Vittar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vittar and Aggarwal have played a deciding set 1 times, with Vittar winning 1 times and Aggarwal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Vittar winning 1, and Aggarwal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vittar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Aggarwal has played against players with an average rank of 45.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vittar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aggarwal has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vittar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aggarwal has converted 32.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vittar 1 - 0 Aggarwal
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (50-48)
Career Total W/L
32% (36-76)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Francisco Vittar | Parth Aggarwal |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 21 | 17 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(6) 4-6 10-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Francisco Vittar | Parth Aggarwal |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (20/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (167/134) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 78% (7/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.05 |
Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 0 | 22 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 100.13 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (240/445) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (144/240) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (106/205) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (17/51) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (154/404) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Francisco Vittar Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Benjamin Hannestad
Player
Francisco Vittar
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Parth Aggarwal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yusuke Takahashi
Player
Parth Aggarwal
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Palan
Player
Parth Aggarwal
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Parth Aggarwal
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Parth Aggarwal
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Parth Aggarwal
Player
Enrico Baldisserri
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more