Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Franco Emanuel Egea vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Egea vs Tiffon analysis and find out who is favored!
Franco Emanuel Egea vs Pol MARTIN Tiffon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Egea has won 45.23% of points on his second serve, while Tiffon has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Egea, in recent form, has won 48.2% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tiffon has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.76% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Egea has saved 52.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tiffon has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Egea has won 50% of matches played (W/L 9/ 9), with Tiffon winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Egea has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 194/ 152), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 35/ 33). Tiffon has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Egea has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 9/ 8), where as Tiffon has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Egea has played against opponents with an average rank of 175.33 while Tiffon has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Egea has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tiffon has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Egea has converted 47.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tiffon has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Egea 0 - 0 Tiffon
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Franco Emanuel Egea | Pol MARTIN Tiffon |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (38/47) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 6 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 8 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 238 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (166/278) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (100/166) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (52/112) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (12/25) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (115/274) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 1st Match |
Franco Emanuel Egea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Tobias Franco
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
22 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Figl
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
44 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Boscardin Dias
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
2
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
36%
(
14 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
49 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
Player
Franco Emanuel Egea
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Valerio Aboian
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Alan Postay
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
43 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
115)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Lorenzo Joaquin Rodriguez
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
84 of
120)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
50 of
84)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Fermin Tenti
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pol MARTIN Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Martin Krumich
35%
(
18 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
105)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
11 of
18)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
53%
(
27 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
105)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
51%
(
55 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
111
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Lucas Bouquet
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Tristan Mccormick
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cezar Cretu
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Michael Vrbensky
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Egea Vs Tiffon Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
