Francois-Arthur Vibert vs Dane Propoggia Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vibert vs Propoggia analysis and find out who is favored!
Francois-Arthur Vibert vs Dane Propoggia Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vibert has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Propoggia has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vibert, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Propoggia has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vibert has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Propoggia has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vibert has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Propoggia winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 183/ 211), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 7/ 28). Propoggia has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 9/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vibert winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vibert winning 2 and Propoggia winning 0. The last match between Vibert and Propoggia was at the Turkey F22, 01-08-2011, Quarterfinals, Clay with Francois-Arthur Vibert getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vibert and Propoggia have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vibert winning 0 times and Propoggia 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Vibert winning 1, and Propoggia 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vibert has played against opponents with an average rank of while Propoggia has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vibert has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Propoggia has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vibert has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Propoggia has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vibert 1 - 0 Propoggia
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
618
High
33
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
295
High
33
Age
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
44% (221-283)
Career Total W/L
56% (235-182)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Francois-Arthur Vibert | Dane Propoggia |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Francois-Arthur Vibert | Dane Propoggia |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Francois-Arthur Vibert Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Simon Beaupain
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
73%
(
72 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Remy Bertola
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Lance-Pierre Du Toit
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Francois-Arthur Vibert
Player
Luca Giacomini
54%
(
40 of
74)
1st Serve %
78%
(
62 of
80)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Francois-Arthur Vibert
Player
Gregorio Cordonnier
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Albert Roglan
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Maciej Rajski
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
60%
(
61 of
101)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
15
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bruno Sant'Anna
Player
Francois-Arthur Vibert
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Dane Propoggia Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Karlo Kranic
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fran Zvonimir Zgombic
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomislav Jotovski
Player
Dane Propoggia
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Harry Bourchier
Player
Dane Propoggia
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Dayne Kelly
Player
Dane Propoggia
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dane Propoggia
Player
Thomas Fancutt
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
6
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Dane Propoggia
Player
Alexander Babanine
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Liam Caruana
Player
Dane Propoggia
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Dane Propoggia
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H |
view more