Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Frederic Niemeyer vs Peter Polansky Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Niemeyer vs Polansky analysis and find out who is favored!
Frederic Niemeyer vs Peter Polansky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Niemeyer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Polansky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Niemeyer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Polansky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Niemeyer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Polansky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Niemeyer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Polansky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Niemeyer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 73% (W/L 81/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 18/ 29). Polansky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 82/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 11/ 21).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Niemeyer winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Niemeyer winning 5 and Polansky winning 2. The last match between Niemeyer and Polansky was at the Oldum Brown Vancouver Open - Vancouver, 01-08-2008, Second, Hard with Peter Polansky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Niemeyer and Polansky have played a deciding set 1 times, with Niemeyer winning 0 times and Polansky 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Niemeyer winning 1, and Polansky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Niemeyer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Polansky has played against players with an average rank of 269.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Niemeyer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Polansky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Niemeyer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Polansky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Niemeyer 2 - 1 Polansky
Ret.
Rank
134
High
47
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
721
Rank
110
High
35
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
54% (250-209)
Career Total W/L
56% (541-428)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$74,370
Career Prize Money
$541,225
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Frederic Niemeyer | Peter Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 38 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 7-6(6) | |||||
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Frederic Niemeyer | Peter Polansky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Frederic Niemeyer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Roger Federer
Player
Frederic Niemeyer
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
12
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Igor Kunitsyn
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kevin Anderson
Player
Frederic Niemeyer
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Michael Yani
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Alexander Kudryavtsev
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Frederic Niemeyer
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
54 of
110)
5
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
9
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Niemeyer Vs Polansky Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
