Gabriela Ce vs Maya Iyengar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the recent performance metrics, we find that in the last six months, Ce has been slightly more effective on their second serve, winning 37.69% of points compared to Iyengar’s 37.1%. This slight edge in second serve points can be essential in determining the likely winner in a closely contested match.

Looking at return game statistics, though, presents a different narrative. Iyengar has captured 53.27% of their opponents' second serve points compared to Ce's 43.2%, illustrating a significant advantage in return games. For first serve returns, the stats remain close with Iyengar at 38.04% and Ce at 37.3%, thereby emphasizing Iyengar's superior return game performance.

Under pressure, measured by breakpoint saving ability, Iyengar also demonstrates a slight edge, saving 57.45% of breakpoints versus Ce’s 53.27%. This aspect is critical for maintaining composure during pivotal moments in the match.

Over the past year, Ce has a higher win percentage at 61.02%, with a record of 36/23, while Iyengar has managed a 57.89% win rate, with an 11/8 record. This provides a broad overview of their respective consistencies on the circuit, suggesting Ce's form could be more reliable.

Evaluating performance based on preferable surfaces reveals that both players excel on clay, with Ce at a 58% win rate and Iyengar at 80%. However, Iyengar seems more adaptable on various surfaces, including Hard courts where they hold a 50% win rate against Ce's 0% win record on Indoor hard.

Both players have been competing primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, but Iyengar exhibits a slightly higher win record of 60% compared to Ce’s 53.06% in these competitions. Notably, Iyengar has faced tougher competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 73.95, quite superior to Ce’s average opponent rank of 243.86 over the past year.

In deciding sets, Ce has a 63% win rate, slightly better than Iyengar's 60%, which might suggest a resilience in critical match moments. Breakpoint conversion statistics are almost even, Ce at 46.77% and Iyengar at 46.15%, indicating both are equally effective at capitalizing on breaking opportunities.

Overall, considering the various statistics and comparisons, the prediction tilts towards Iyengar as the potential victor in this matchup. The advantages in return game performance, the experience against higher-ranked opponents, and a solid breakpoint saving rate may prove decisive in Iyengar securing the win against Ce.