Gabriella Da Silva Fick vs Mana Kawamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 May at 07:58 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Da Silva Fick vs M. Kawamura

AUS
0
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fick 0 - 0 Kawamura
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Fick | 0 |
Kawamura | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
no past h2h happened.
G. D. S. Fick vs M. Kawamura H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
0% (0-0) | Career Total W/L | 0% (0-0) |
1 | Titles | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. D. S. Fick vs M. Kawamura Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Kawamura has won 39.48% of points on their second serve in the last six months, compared to Fick's 44.32%. Is Fick's stronger second serve performance an edge? Yes, it might be.
- Return Game Strength: Kawamura has successfully returned 48.12% of opponents' second serves, slightly lower than Fick's 49.75%. For first serve returns, Kawamura outperforms Fick, with 39.41% compared to Fick's 30.54%. Could this first serve return advantage help Kawamura? Potentially.
- Under Pressure: In saving breakpoints, Kawamura excels with 51.45%, whereas Fick manages 43.18%. Does Kawamura thrive under pressure? Likely so, given these stats.
- Overall Performance: In terms of match wins over the past year, Kawamura holds a slight edge with 50.91% compared to Fick's 49.12%.
- Surface Proficiency: Kawamura is better on clay with a 65% win rate, while Fick shines on grass with 70%. Could Fick's weaker performance on hard courts impact the match? It might, depending on the surface of the event.
- Level of Play: Both players mostly engage at a similar competitive level (Challengers/ITF), but Kawamura has a slight edge with a 52.27% match win rate compared to Fick's 50%.
- Opponent Quality: Kawamura's opponents average a rank of 404.07, whereas Fick has faced stronger opponents averaging a 360.74 rank. Does playing tougher rivals better prepare Fick? It could be a factor.
- Deciding Set Performance: Fick is more successful in critical scenarios, winning 47% of deciding sets, a clear advantage over Kawamura's 31%.
- Break Point Conversion: Recently, Fick has converted 39.42% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Kawamura's 37.37% rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performance statistics, Fick displays a marginally stronger performance on second serves and is more successful in converting breakpoints. This insight could favor Fick in key game moments, particularly where breaks are pivotal.
Additionally, Fick's experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests they may be slightly better prepared for competitive pressure. Meanwhile, Kawamura excels under breakpoint situations and has shown a stronger return on first serve points.
Kawamura’s advantage on clay might not be significant if the surface doesn't align with their strength, while Fick's superior deciding set performance indicates steadier nerves in tight match conclusions.
Based on these factors, Fick appears to have a slight edge and is likely to win the upcoming match, although unexpected changes during the event can always influence the outcome.
Gabriella Da Silva Fick vs Mana Kawamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
G. D. S. Fick Recent Matches Played
M. Kawamura Recent Matches Played

G. D. S. Fick vs M. Kawamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53.00% (168/149) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.43% (148/119) |
52.65% (378/340) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.34% (342/265) |
51.90% (3395/3147) | Games Win/Loss | 53.99% (2904/2475) |
50.46% (110/108) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.63% (60/54) |
57.75% (41/30) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.47% (67/42) |
37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.50% (19/21) |
70.00% (14/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
895 | Aces Total | 156 |
0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
858 | Total Double Faults | 512 |
1:21:1 | Average Match Time | 1:20:45 |
439.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 430.22 |
59% (10097/17125) | 1st Serve % | 66% (9119/13911) |
63% (6408/10097) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (5233/9119) |
46% (3208/7028) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2181/4792) |
47% (939/1999) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (930/1850) |
44% (7568/17053) | Return Points Win % | 48% (6575/13727) |
0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
12.50% (1/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
54.37% (143/120) | Challenger W/L | 55.61% (119/95) |
53.33% (24/21) | Futures W/L | 54.72% (29/24) |
53% (163/310) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (146/263) |
75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
55% (40/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (19/35) |
48% (40/83) | Deciding Set Win % | 37% (27/73) |
86% (167/144) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (164/136) |
14% (167/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (164/28) |
16% (150/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (103/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Fick (W35 Darwin)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
