Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gage Brymer vs Matteo DE Vincentis Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brymer vs Vincentis analysis and find out who is favored!
Gage Brymer vs Matteo DE Vincentis Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brymer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vincentis has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brymer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vincentis has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brymer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vincentis has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brymer has won 38.89% of matches played (W/L 14/ 22), with Vincentis winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brymer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 218/ 157), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8). Vincentis has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Brymer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 41.94% of matches (W/L 13/ 18), where as Vincentis has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brymer has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.22 while Vincentis has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brymer has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vincentis has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brymer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vincentis has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brymer 0 - 0 Vincentis
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gage Brymer | Matteo DE Vincentis |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Gage Brymer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Makoto Ochi
Player
Gage Brymer
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Ryota Tanuma
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Yuta Kawahashi
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
52%
(
44 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 7-6(9) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Kawahashi
Player
Gage Brymer
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
1
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thantub Suksumrarn
Player
Gage Brymer
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Gage Brymer
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Siddhant Banthia
Player
Gage Brymer
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Gage Brymer
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo DE Vincentis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Valentin Lapalu
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
7 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Sergi Fita Juan
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Moroni
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
68 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Igor Trunov
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
6
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo De Vincentis
Player
Andre Szilvassy
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve %
77%
(
49 of
64)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Brymer Vs Vincentis Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
