Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
George Loffhagen vs Eric Vanshelboim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loffhagen vs Vanshelboim analysis and find out who is favored!
George Loffhagen vs Eric Vanshelboim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loffhagen has won 58.29% of points on his second serve, while Vanshelboim has won 49.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loffhagen, in recent form, has won 48.51% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vanshelboim has won 54.43%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.4% and 36.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loffhagen has saved 47.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vanshelboim has saved 56.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loffhagen has won 65.71% of matches played (W/L 23/ 12), with Vanshelboim winning 64.56% (W/L 51/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loffhagen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 32/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7). Vanshelboim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 150/ 72), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Loffhagen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8), where as Vanshelboim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.18% of matches (W/L 40/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loffhagen winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loffhagen winning 2 and Vanshelboim winning 0. The last match between Loffhagen and Vanshelboim was at the M15 Poprad, 08-07-2021, Second, Clay with George Loffhagen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loffhagen and Vanshelboim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loffhagen winning 0 times and Vanshelboim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loffhagen winning 0, and Vanshelboim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loffhagen has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.09 while Vanshelboim has played against players with an average rank of 190.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loffhagen has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vanshelboim has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loffhagen has converted 43.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vanshelboim has converted 44.58% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loffhagen 1 - 0 Vanshelboim
441
Rank
333
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
403
Rank
357
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
61% (137-86)
Career Total W/L
66% (201-105)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
58% (14-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Loffhagen VS Vanshelboim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | George Loffhagen | Eric Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 9 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (24/31) | 73% (33/45) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (19/24) | 45% (15/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (5/7) | 58% (7/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (23/45) | 23% (7/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Loffhagen VS Vanshelboim H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-1 ret. |
Stats 
George Loffhagen
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
47
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | George Loffhagen | Eric Vanshelboim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 58% (14/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 59% (33/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (68/56) | 52% (270/248) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 32 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 80 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:40 | 1:54:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 60.83 | 233.29 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (240/379) | 69% (1170/1696) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (176/240) | 62% (727/1170) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 58% (81/139) | 48% (253/526) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (16/37) | 47% (95/202) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (167/418) | 44% (767/1740) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 73% (8/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 25% (12/3) |
George Loffhagen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Rigele Te
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henry Searle
Player
George Loffhagen
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
9 of
9)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
44%
(
12 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Michael Shaw
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
26 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
George Loffhagen
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Johannes Seeman
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
George Loffhagen
64%
(
80 of
125)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
39%
(
49 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
31 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
117
|
4-6 7-6(7) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
George Loffhagen
Player
Patrick Brady
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
64 of
85)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
35 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
view more
Eric Vanshelboim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Aryan Shah
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Manish Sureshkumar
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
70 of
106)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
48 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
105)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Nikola Puntaric
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fitriadi M Rifqi
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Manish Ganesh
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Eric Vanshelboim
57%
(
64 of
113)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
102)
9
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
36 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Loffhagen Vs Vanshelboim Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
