Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Villasenor vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Villasenor has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Villasenor, in recent form, has won 44.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 21.74% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Villasenor has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Villasenor has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Villasenor has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Villasenor has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Spec has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Villasenor winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Villasenor winning 2 and Spec winning 1. The last match between Villasenor and Spec was at the M15 Cancun, 07-02-2020, Second, Hard with Gerardo Lopez Villasenor getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Villasenor and Spec have played a deciding set 1 times, with Villasenor winning 1 times and Spec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Villasenor winning 0, and Spec 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Villasenor has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.5 while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Villasenor has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Villasenor has converted 20% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Villasenor 1 - 0 Spec
843
Rank
505
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (109-88)
Career Total W/L
64% (167-95)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Villasenor VS Spec H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Gerardo Lopez Villasenor | Matic Spec |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 13 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:0 | 2:19:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (55/85) | 45% (33/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (35/55) | 79% (26/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (15/30) | 48% (19/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (28/73) | 41% (35/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Villasenor VS Spec H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 1-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
Player
Matic Spec
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
73)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gerardo Lopez Villasenor | Matic Spec |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Manuel Aguilar
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
22 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
15
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ishaan Ravichander
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Franco Descotte
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
84)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
7
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
Player
Bruno Kuzuhara
65%
(
60 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerardo Lopez Villasenor
Player
Noah Schachter
66%
(
71 of
107)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Villasenor Vs Spec Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
