Giacomo Crisostomo vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Oct at 07:41 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Crisostomo vs B. Gusic Wan

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crisostomo 1 - 0 Wan
They have played 2 sets in total, with Giacomo Crisostomo winning 2 and Benjamin Gusic Wan winning 0. The last match between Giacomo Crisostomo and Benjamin Gusic Wan was at the M15 Heraklion, 15-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Giacomo Crisostomo getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crisostomo | 1 |
| Wan | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Heraklion(10-15-25)
G. Crisostomo vs B. G. Wan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.17% (64-52) | Career Total W/L | 42.86% (15-20) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Crisostomo vs B. G. Wan Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve performance, Giacomo Crisostomo has proved slightly superior, winning 43.49% of points compared to Benjamin Gusic Wan's 40.62%. Could this give Crisostomo a slight edge in this part of the game?
- When analyzing return game statistics, Crisostomo outshines Gusic Wan by winning 46.05% of second serve return points versus Gusic Wan’s 42.86%. Similarly, Crisostomo has an edge on first serve returns with 31.28% compared to Gusic Wan's 28.38%.
- Under pressure, Crisostomo also performs better, saving 48.18% of breakpoints against Gusic Wan's 45.63%, potentially indicating stronger mental resilience during tight moments.
- In overall match performance over the last year, Crisostomo has a favorable winning percentage of 60.78% in comparison to Gusic Wan’s 47.62%.
- Surface preferences show that Crisostomo excels on clay with a 56% win rate, whereas Gusic Wan's performance drops significantly on clay, winning 0% of his matches.
- Level of competition analysis shows Crisostomo facing tougher opponents with an average rank of 192.24, while Wan's opponents had an average rank of 248, suggesting Crisostomo may be more battle-tested.
Editorial Prediction (October 15, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performance metrics, Giacomo Crisostomo shows a slight advantage in key areas such as second serve effectiveness and return game proficiency. These areas are typically influential in swinging match outcomes, suggesting he could potentially outperform his opponent during rallies and service games.
In pressure situations, Crisostomo exhibits a marginally superior ability to save breakpoints. Such resilience might play a crucial role if the match becomes a closely contested affair, allowing him to maintain composure in decisive moments.
Furthermore, their head-to-head context, with Crisostomo having faced higher-ranked opponents, may further prime him for success due to the more competitive experience. While surface preferences could also favor Crisostomo, particularly if any part of the match takes place on a clay court.
In light of these comparative advantages, Giacomo Crisostomo appears to have the upper hand and is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming tennis match.
Giacomo Crisostomo vs Benjamin Gusic Wan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Crisostomo vs B. G. Wan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:41:25 | Average Match Time | 1:41:25 |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve % | 59% (36/61) |
| 61% (22/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24/36) |
| 62% (13/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 49% (30/61) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Crisostomo Recent Matches Played
B. G. Wan Recent Matches Played

G. Crisostomo vs B. G. Wan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.17% (64/52) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 53.49% (138/120) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.67% (32/43) |
| 52.31% (1278/1165) | Games Win/Loss | 48.67% (330/348) |
| 52.63% (10/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.15% (13/14) |
| 55.56% (50/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 92 | Aces Total | 41 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 138 | Total Double Faults | 125 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:16:13 |
| 187.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 258.23 |
| 60% (2358/3931) | 1st Serve % | 54% (974/1807) |
| 60% (1416/2358) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (624/974) |
| 51% (799/1573) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (397/833) |
| 47% (203/434) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (78/169) |
| 43% (1725/4027) | Return Points Win % | 39% (685/1736) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 55.17% (64/52) | Futures W/L | 44.12% (15/19) |
| 55% (64/116) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 33% (6/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 62% (16/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 92% (60/55) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (13/12) |
| 8% (60/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (13/1) |
| 16% (56/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (22/3) |