Gianmarco Ferrari vs Osman Torski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ferrari vs Torski analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianmarco Ferrari vs Osman Torski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ferrari has won 48.35% of points on his second serve, while Torski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ferrari, in recent form, has won 46.84% of his opponent's second serve points, while Torski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.72% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ferrari has saved 61.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Torski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ferrari has won 45.76% of matches played (W/L 27/ 32), with Torski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ferrari has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 103/ 86), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 10/ 16). Torski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 19/ 16), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Ferrari has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.12% of matches (W/L 15/ 19), where as Torski has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ferrari winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ferrari winning 2 and Torski winning 0. The last match between Ferrari and Torski was at the M15 Ulcinj, 20-09-2021, Q2 round, Clay with Gianmarco Ferrari getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ferrari and Torski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ferrari winning 0 times and Torski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ferrari winning 0, and Torski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ferrari has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.27 while Torski has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ferrari has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Torski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ferrari has converted 40.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Torski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ferrari 1 - 0 Torski
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
538
Rank
387
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
51% (124-117)
Career Total W/L
48% (23-25)
27% (3-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Osman Torski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-5 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gianmarco Ferrari | Osman Torski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 30% (8/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (124/161) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
Aces Total | 47 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
DFs Total | 39 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:8:2 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 281.18 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (596/946) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (400/596) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (161/350) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (22/53) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 32% (278/862) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Gianmarco Ferrari Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
47 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
George Loffhagen
69%
(
79 of
115)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
37 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
121
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
25%
(
7 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stuart Parker
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gianmarco Ferrari
Player
Ben Jones
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Jones
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henry Searle
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
70%
(
71 of
102)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
16
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
27 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Osman Torski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alexander Weis
Player
Osman Torski
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
38 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 5-7 11-9 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Lenny Hampel
Player
Osman Torski
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Osman Torski
Player
John Sperle
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Osman Torski
Player
Kai Lemstra
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
58%
(
35 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 0-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Miljan Zekic
Player
Osman Torski
56%
(
50 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more