Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gilad Tamar vs Mattias Southcombe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tamar vs Southcombe analysis and find out who is favored!
Gilad Tamar vs Mattias Southcombe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tamar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Southcombe has won 34.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tamar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Southcombe has won 48.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tamar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Southcombe has saved 56.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tamar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Southcombe winning 53.42% (W/L 39/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tamar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 59/ 63), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5). Southcombe has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tamar winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tamar winning 0 and Southcombe winning 2. The last match between Tamar and Southcombe was at the M15 Akko, 18-05-2022, First, Hard with Mattias Southcombe getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tamar and Southcombe have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tamar winning 0 times and Southcombe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tamar winning 0, and Southcombe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tamar has played against opponents with an average rank of while Southcombe has played against players with an average rank of 35.1.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tamar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Southcombe has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tamar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Southcombe has converted 35.53% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tamar 0 - 1 Southcombe
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
48% (62-68)
Career Total W/L
49% (72-76)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
38% (6-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tamar VS Southcombe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Gilad Tamar | Mattias Southcombe |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:0 | 1:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (28/56) | 45% (20/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (18/28) | 80% (16/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 18% (5/28) | 46% (11/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 60% (6/10) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (17/44) | 59% (33/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tamar VS Southcombe H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Gilad Tamar
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gilad Tamar | Mattias Southcombe |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (6/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (12/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (153/193) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (6/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (218/380) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (148/218) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (49/162) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (15/36) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (152/382) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (6/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 9% (11/1) |
Gilad Tamar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Gilad Tamar
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Ori Baron
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gilad Tamar
Player
Eduardo Cohen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Gilad Tamar
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
5 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jannik Rother
Player
Gilad Tamar
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Mattias Southcombe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Ying Hou
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Leo Vithoontien
Player
Mattias Southcombe
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Suphawat Saeoui
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
16
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
39 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(4) 6-4 14-12 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corban Crowther
Player
Mattias Southcombe
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamar Vs Southcombe Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
