Giles Hussey vs Stefan Dostanic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Aug at 07:47 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Hussey vs S. Dostanic

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hussey 1 - 0 Dostanic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Giles Hussey winning 2 and Stefan Dostanic winning 1. The last match between Giles Hussey and Stefan Dostanic was at the Chicago Challenger, 07-08-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Giles Hussey getting the victory 4-6 7-5 4-2 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hussey | 1 |
| Dostanic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Chicago Challenger(08-07-25)
G. Hussey vs S. Dostanic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $12,990 | Career Prize Money | $7,005 |
| 62.97% (199-117) | Career Total W/L | 63.85% (83-47) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1-2) |
G. Hussey vs S. Dostanic Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Hussey has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.39% of points compared to Dostanic's 45.86%. Could this marginal difference influence the match outcome?
- Return Game Strength: While Dostanic wins more second serve return points at 46.09%, Hussey excels slightly on first serve returns at 28.59% compared to Dostanic’s 27.66%. Who benefits more from these stats?
- Handling Pressure: Dostanic outperforms under pressure, saving 58.82% of breakpoints, whereas Hussey saves 54.68%.
- Overall Match Wins: Over the past year, Dostanic has a higher match win percentage at 66.67% compared to Hussey's 62.9%.
- Preferred Surface: Hussey is strongest on Hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Dostanic excels on Clay with an 83% win rate.
- Competition Level: Hussey plays primarily in Challengers/ITF, winning 63.64% of matches, whereas Dostanic competes mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF, with a higher win rate of 84.62%.
- Opponent Quality: Dostanic has faced tougher opponents on average, ranked 331.44, compared to Hussey's opponents with an average rank of 401.26.
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets, Dostanic has a slight edge, winning 53% of such situations compared to Hussey's 50%.
- Break Point Conversion: Dostanic also leads in converting break points, achieving a 41.18% success rate against Hussey's 32.46%.
Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit strengths in different aspects of their game, making this match an intriguing contest.
Hussey's slight advantage in second serve performance and first serve returns could play a crucial role if they maximize these strengths. However, Dostanic's ability to save breakpoints effectively and convert more break opportunities may give him the edge in pivotal moments.
Despite Hussey's superior record on Hard courts, the overall higher quality of opponents faced by Dostanic and his recent performance in critical match situations suggest he has a slight advantage.
Considering these statistical insights, Dostanic is slightly favored to win this match, thanks to his consistency in handling pressure and higher win percentage in various scenarios.
Giles Hussey vs Stefan Dostanic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Hussey vs S. Dostanic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 13 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:23:42 | Average Match Time | 2:23:42 |
| 65% (69/106) | 1st Serve % | 69% (49/71) |
| 61% (42/69) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (33/49) |
| 57% (21/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (11/22) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (3/12) |
| 38% (27/71) | Return Points Win % | 41% (43/106) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Hussey Recent Matches Played
S. Dostanic Recent Matches Played

G. Hussey vs S. Dostanic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.97% (199/117) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.85% (83/47) |
| 59.89% (439/294) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.76% (189/117) |
| 53.69% (3728/3216) | Games Win/Loss | 54.37% (1556/1306) |
| 66.50% (133/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.83% (71/42) |
| 65.71% (23/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 83.33% (5/1) |
| 61.67% (37/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 28.57% (6/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 877 | Aces Total | 668 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 743 | Total Double Faults | 404 |
| 1:35:48 | Average Match Time | 1:34:42 |
| 475.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.41 |
| 62% (12023/19247) | 1st Serve % | 62% (5223/8454) |
| 67% (8085/12023) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (3689/5223) |
| 51% (3674/7224) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1628/3231) |
| 44% (908/2077) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (381/930) |
| 41% (8064/19545) | Return Points Win % | 41% (3636/8901) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 52.24% (35/32) | Challenger W/L | 51.02% (25/24) |
| 66.67% (162/81) | Futures W/L | 74.03% (57/20) |
| 63% (194/310) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (82/124) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 51% (46/91) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (24/37) |
| 58% (57/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (22/42) |
| 85% (194/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (76/67) |
| 15% (194/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (76/9) |
| 29% (122/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (54/16) |